走向无限
Going Infinite
Michael Lewis · 初版 2023 年
4人推荐
31位读者提及
32次提及
为什么值得读
- 作者获得了贴近核心当事人的深度采访机会
- 叙事流畅引人入胜，延续了作者出色的文风
- 聚焦极富戏剧性与话题度的争议科技金融事件
讲述 Sam Bankman-Fried 的生平，直至 FTX/Alameda Research 崩盘后不久的生活。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Going Infinite
Michael Lewis · 初版 2023 年
讲述 Sam Bankman-Fried 的生平，直至 FTX/Alameda Research 崩盘后不久的生活。
正在加载完整评论……
- Michael Lewis 的《Going Infinite》- John Doerr 的《Speed & Scale》- Nick Bostrom 的《Superintelligence》。都是好书，强烈推荐。
- "Going Infinite", by Michael Lewis - "Speed & Scale", John Doerr - "Superintelligence", by Nick Bostrom All great reads, strongly recommended.
……像 Lewis 最近那样把 Michael Oher 说成患有 CTE），但在这儿大家普遍有个共识，觉得 Gladwell 不值得读，对 Lewis 倒没那么排斥。所以我感觉你对《Going Infinite》这类书的别扭之处在于：SBF 显然是个很有意思的书籍题材，而且因为 Lewis 早就被他圈粉了/被他彻底拿下了，所以拿到了大量的独家接触机会，再加上 Lewis 笔头确实硬。所以如果你也是我们这类 nerd，你就会……
…Michael Oher as suffering from CTE the way Lewis recently did), but it's an article of faith here that Gladwell isn't worth reading, and not so much with Lewis. So I think your problem with a book like Going Infinite is: SBF is obviously an interesting subject for a book, and, because Lewis was pre-sold on/to him, he had extensive access, and Lewis can definitely write. So if you're the kind of nerd we all are, you're…
我挺喜欢 Matt Levine 对《Going Infinite》的评价：> 我读过的很多书评都在抱怨 Lewis 没有充分讲清楚“Bankman-Fried 实际上罪有应得、坏透了”，但这并不是他想写的那本书……
I like Matt Levine's take on Going Infinite: > Many of the reviews that I have read of the book complain that Lewis does not sufficiently explain that Bankman-Fried is Guilty and Bad, Actually, but that is not the book that he wanted to write…
我读过很多 Lewis 的书，几十年来一直很佩服他讲故事的能力和写作风格。我觉得《Going Infinite》读起来挺有意思，但不如《The Big Short》、《Liar's Poker》、《Moneyball》这些过瘾。作为很好的补充甚至替代，我强烈推荐 Zvi Mowshowitz 对《Going Infinite》的书评[1]。我有点……
I have read many Lewis' books and admired his skills as a storyteller and stylist for decades. I found Going Infinite fun to read but less satisfying than The Big Short, Liar's Poker, Moneybag, etc. As a good complement or even substitute, I highly recommend Zvi Mowshowitz's review[1] of Going Infinite. I have some…
……简直就是个随机数。到底是怎么下得了手 commit 这种代码、晚上还能睡得着觉的？到现在居然还有人为 SBF 辩护，真是让人大跌眼镜。在他那一票奉承者里就有 Michael Lewis——《Moneyball》和《The Big Short》的作者，现在又搞了本《Going Infinite》，硬是把 FTX 从成立之初就充斥的猖獗欺诈给轻描淡写地带过去了。
…literally a random number. How did someone commit that and sleep at night? It’s amazing that some people still defend SBF. Among his sycophants is Michael Lewis, author of Moneyball, The Big Short, and now “Going Infinite” which somehow manages to gloss over the rampant fraud happening at FTX since inception.
我从来没怀疑过，但真有人怀疑过吗？Michael Lewis 的《Going Infinite》（至少在我看来）把 SBF 描绘成了一个卷入自己无法理解的事物里的倒霉孩子。Lewis 是我读到的唯一一个似乎在替 SBF 辩护的人。难道就只有他一个人这样吗？
I never had any doubt but did anyone have doubt? Michael Lewis's book Going Infinite portrayed SBF (to me at least) as a hapless kid caught up in something he did not understand. Lewis is the only person I have read that seemed to defend SBF. Was he the only one?