沙乡年鉴
A Sand County Almanac
Aldo Leopold · 初版 1949 年
5人推荐
11位读者提及
15次提及
为什么值得读
- 文笔极具美感且给人带来深刻的阅读愉悦
- 包含《像山一样思考》等经典自然生态篇章
- 从生态根本根源审视人与土地的相处之道
A Sand County Almanac 于1949年首次出版，被 The New York Times Book Review 誉为一部“犀利透彻、生机勃勃且发人深省”的著作。它将 Thoreau 以来最出色的自然文学写作，与对美国人与土地关系的直率且高度道德审视的关怀融为一体。凭借对自然法则无与伦比的洞察力，全书包括一个按月份记述威斯康星乡间变迁的章节；另一部分则汇集了 Leopold 在过去四十年游历威斯康星、艾奥瓦、亚利桑那、索诺拉、俄勒冈和马尼托巴的林地时所写的随笔短文……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
我极力推荐利奥波德的《沙乡年鉴》（A Sand County Almanac）。其实我最初是在 HN 上听说这本书的，很高兴看到这里能有更多他的作品被分享出来。要看他的另一篇神作，推荐读读《好橡树》（Good Oak）。
I can't recommend Leopold's A Sand County Almanac enough. I first heard of it on HN, actually, and I'm so glad to see more of his work posted here. For another great essay by him, give Good Oak a read.
奥尔多·利奥波德，《沙乡年鉴》（Sand County Almanac）。德语对照：约瑟夫·赖希霍夫（Josef Reichholf）的《我为自然而生》（Mein Leben für die Natur）。
Aldo Leopold, "Sand County Almanac". In German: Josef Reichholf, "Mein Leben für die Natur".
在阅读奥尔多·利奥波德出自《沙乡年鉴》的著名短文《像山那样思考》（Thinking Like a Mountain）时，很值得记住最后这句话：“智胜了最狡黠的动物恶徒的人，就这样平淡地讲述了他的故事。”：https://ia600707.us.archive.org/6/items/ThinkingLikeAMountai...
It's worth remebering this last phrase "In that simple fashion does the man who outwitted the cleverest of animal criminals tell his story." whilst reading Aldo Leopold famous short piece from A Sand County Almanac, Thinking Like a Mountain: https://ia600707.us.archive.org/6/items/ThinkingLikeAMountai...
你的文笔非常有奥尔多·利奥波德在《沙乡年鉴》（读起来同样令人赏心悦目）里的神韵。
Your writing is very reminiscent of Aldo Leopold's in 'A Sand County Almanac' (which is an equal delight to read)
……控制杂草而不是预防杂草——很多时候杂草只是某种根本原因（土地滥用等）导致的后果。总之我非常欣赏利奥波德和他的哲学理念，如果你从没听过他，不妨读读《沙乡年鉴》（A Sand County Almanac）[2]。0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldo_Leopold 1: https://books.google.com/books?id=-StPpe04gS8C&pg=PA306&lpg=... 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Sand_County_Almanac
…control rather than weed prevention--many times weeds are the effect of some underlying cause (land misuse, etc.). Anyway I really dig Leopold and his philosophy, if you've never heard of him give A Sand County Almanac [2] a try. 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldo_Leopold 1: https://books.google.com/books?id=-StPpe04gS8C&pg=PA306&lpg=... 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Sand_County_Almanac
呃，我觉得和列表里那些项目相比，至少有几处明显的不同。最强大的一点就是讲故事（storytelling）。我最近读了几本博物学家的书（比如《沙乡年鉴》，简直神作），这比你列出的任何东西都有效得多地改变了我的看法。电子游戏即便相比好故事所拥有的其他优势，似乎也相当显著：……
Eh I think there are at least a few notable differences compared to those list items. Most powerful one is storytelling. I’ve recently been reading a few books by naturalists (e.g. A Sand County Almanac, which is incredible) and that has changed my views far, far more effectively than any of the things you listed. Other benefits video games might have even over a great story seem like they’d be notable:…