文学的用途
Uses of literature
Rita Felski · 初版 2008 年
2位读者提及
2次提及
Rita Felski 在这部开创性的新著作中探讨了我们为何阅读的各种动机与奥秘。Uses of Literature 挑战了当代文学批评中提出的许多陈词滥调和理论，为阅读文学的目的与价值提供了令人耳目一新的见解。作者提出读者与文学之间的互动涉及四种“文本介入模式”——认同（Recognition）、入迷（enchantment）、知识（knowledge）和震撼（shock），从而弥合了文学理论与关于文学的常识性认知之间的鸿沟。——护封文案。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
在《The Bestseller Code》里，Archer 和 Jockers 提到了这一点，以此解释为什么文学批评和大众阅读脱节。他们提到了 Rita Felski 的《Uses of Literature》，认为它算是一种“宣言”，呼吁批评界应该更认真地看待通俗阅读。我还没看完，但从 Amazon 上的试读内容来看挺不错的。
In The Bestseller Code, Archer and Jockers touch on this to explain why literary criticism is out of touch with popular reading. They mention Uses of Literature by Rita Felski as as a "manifesto" of sorts about how criticism could take it more seriously. I haven't completed it, but the sample from Amazon looks promising.
……通过对景观的描绘，既构建又微妙地瓦解了帝国父权制，从而形成了一种张力。这跟大多数人类阅读有什么关系？Rita Felski 的书《Uses of Literature》被亚利桑那州立大学（A.S.U.）Adams 的课堂选用，她指出学术界的职业实践已经变得自断退路般轻视打动人心的文学邂逅。“回顾过去，许多宏大理论……
…enacts a tension by both constructing and subtly undermining the imperial patriarchy through its descriptions of landscape. What does this have to do with how most humans read? Rita Felski, whose book “Uses of Literature” is studied in Adams’s A.S.U. class, has argued that the professional practice of scholarship has become self-defeatingly disdainful of moving literary encounters. “In retrospect, much of the grand theory…