……在科技行业，但由于主动和被动的阻力而没有去成。2. 很多评论在讨论女性为什么不在科技圈，因为她们自己不想去。我发誓，这些讨论帖简直就像是从 Joanna Russ 的《How to Suppress Women's Writing》里直接抄出来的（我强烈推荐这本书；真的太他妈搞笑了）。
…in tech and not doing so due to active and passive opposition. 2. Many comments discussing how women aren't in tech because they don't want to be there. I swear, these threads are all straight out of How to Suppress Women's Writing by Joanna Russ (a book I strongly recommend; it's absolutely hi-damn-larious.)
…Fowler's accomplishments in taking TK down, and I would like to correct the notion that the culture/TK himself/Waymo is what brought TK down." I'd like to take this opportunity to plug Joanna Russ' book, How to Suppress Women's Writing. It's hard to find now, but a very entertaining read. Specifically, in this case, I believe this is the "she didn't really do it" step, or possibly the "but it's not really very important anyway" step.
This is #4 (Pollution of Agency) and #8 (Anomalousness) from Joanna Russ's How to Suppress Women's Writing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Suppress_Women%27s_Writ...). Poorly written papers are a regular occurrence in any field - that doesn't justify attributing bad faith or character issues to Dr.…
……在科技行业，但由于主动和被动的阻力而没有去成。2. 很多评论在讨论女性为什么不在科技圈，因为她们自己不想去。我发誓，这些讨论帖简直就像是从 Joanna Russ 的《How to Suppress Women's Writing》里直接抄出来的（我强烈推荐这本书；真的太他妈搞笑了）。
…in tech and not doing so due to active and passive opposition. 2. Many comments discussing how women aren't in tech because they don't want to be there. I swear, these threads are all straight out of How to Suppress Women's Writing by Joanna Russ (a book I strongly recommend; it's absolutely hi-damn-larious.)
……Fowler 在搞垮 TK 方面的功劳，而且我想纠正一种观点，即所谓的企业文化/TK 本人/Waymo 才是搞垮 TK 的原因。”我想借此机会安利一下 Joanna Russ 的书《How to Suppress Women's Writing》。现在这书不好找了，但读起来非常有意思。具体到这件事上，我认为这就是典型的“她其实没出什么力”套路，或者也可能是“反正这事本来也没多大不了”的套路。
…Fowler's accomplishments in taking TK down, and I would like to correct the notion that the culture/TK himself/Waymo is what brought TK down." I'd like to take this opportunity to plug Joanna Russ' book, How to Suppress Women's Writing. It's hard to find now, but a very entertaining read. Specifically, in this case, I believe this is the "she didn't really do it" step, or possibly the "but it's not really very important anyway" step.
关于如何抹杀女性存在感的更多套路，我推荐 Joanna Russ 的《How to Suppress Women's Writing》。
I recommend Joanna Russ' How to Suppress Women's Writing for more tips on how to deny women's presence.
另外，你可能对 Joanna Russ 的《How to Suppress Women's Writing》感兴趣
Also you may be interested in Joanna Russ' "How to Suppress Women's Writing"
这就是 Joanna Russ 在《How to Suppress Women's Writing》（https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Suppress_Women%27s_Writ...）里总结的第 4 条（主体性的玷污）和第 8 条（异常论）。写得烂的论文在任何领域都司空见惯——但这并不能成为把恶意或人品问题扣在……博士头上的理由。
This is #4 (Pollution of Agency) and #8 (Anomalousness) from Joanna Russ's How to Suppress Women's Writing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Suppress_Women%27s_Writ...). Poorly written papers are a regular occurrence in any field - that doesn't justify attributing bad faith or character issues to Dr.…