文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建
The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
Samuel P. Huntington、Ṭalʻat Shāyib、Ṣalāḥ Qanṣūh · 初版 1996 年
1人推荐
5位读者提及
5次提及
摘自序言……1993 年夏，Foreign Affairs 杂志发表了我题为“The Clash of Civilizations?”的文章。据 Foreign Affairs 编辑称，这篇文章在三年内引发的讨论，比该刊自 20 世纪 40 年代以来发表的任何其他文章都要多。在三年里它引发的争论无疑超过了我写的任何其他文字。针对该文的回应和评论来自各大洲的数十个国家。人们对我的观点表现出各不相同的印象深刻、好奇、愤怒、恐惧与困惑，该观点认为核心且最危险的
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
你读过平克的《白板》，还有《国家为什么会失败：权力、繁荣与贫困的根源》吗？还有塞缪尔·亨廷顿的《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》呢？另外，格雷克的《混沌：开创新科学》读过没？哦，小说方面推荐詹姆斯·S·A·科里的《苍穹浩瀚》系列，读起来非——常轻松，通常都很幽默，而且相当精妙。
Have you read Pinker: The Blank Slate, and Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty? And "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order" by Samuel P. Huntington? Also, Gleick: Chaos? Oh, and for fiction the James S. A. Corey: The Expanse series, veeeery easy to read, normally funny, and quite clever.
……并不是因为其思想、价值观或宗教的优越性，而是因为其在运用有组织暴力方面的优越性。西方人常常忘记这一事实，非西方人却从未忘记”——塞缪尔·亨廷顿，《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》，第 51 页。
…the superiority of its ideas or values or religion, but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do" -- Samuel Huntington. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, p. 51.
……是有道理的。不管叫什么名字，这个分类本身是很有用的。至于拉丁美洲算不算西方的一部分，这就更有意思了。我最近在读塞缪尔·P·亨廷顿的《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》，他在书里花了很多篇幅讨论文明，他把文明定义为人类在区别人类本身之外最高层次的文化归类。拉丁美洲的语言、法律和宗教很大程度上都源于……
…makes sense. The category itself, regardless of its label, is useful. In terms of Latin America being a part of the West or not, that's more interesting. I'm currently reading Samuel P. Huntington's "A Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order" and in it he talks a lot about civilizations which he defines as the highest cultural grouping of people short of what makes us human. Language, law, and religion in Latin America largely derive from…
这是很天真的看法。听说过《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》吗？这可是一本真真切切的书。西方人根本没真正意识到，他们的政治领导人在世界其他地方的人眼里能有多堕落。一个很好的例子就是拒绝提供援助或者某些……的政策。
This is the naive viewpoint. Ever head about "The Clash Of Civilizations: And The Remaking Of World Order", which is actually a book? Westerners do not truly understand how degenerate their political leaders can come across to the rest of the world. A good of example if the policy of denying aid or some…
谢谢，算了吧。我打算先读《文明的冲突与世界秩序的重建》，因为它是争议最大的一本（评价两极分化），如果我觉得不错再继续看下去。
Thanks, no. I'll start with "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order" as it's the most controversial one (spread of reviews) and if I like it I'll keep going.