反托拉斯悖论
The antitrust paradox
Robert H. Bork · 初版 1978 年
5人推荐
29位读者提及
38次提及
为什么值得读
- 解释过去四十年法庭在反垄断审判中的裁判逻辑
- 帮助理解现代反垄断法聚焦价格标准的历史由来
- 展现主导反垄断司法数十年的主流学说体系
自1978年首次出版以来，这部由我们时代最杰出的美国法律学者之一撰写的开创性著作，极大地改变了法院对政府在私人事务中角色的看法。这部经典著作现已再版，并附有作者的新引言和后记，它揭示了 antitrust 诉讼如何通过对低效且缺乏竞争力的小企业提供高成本保护，进而对消费者造成负面影响。Robert Bork 对 antitrust law 的见解，对该法律的解释与适用方式产生了深远的影响。The Antitrust Paradox 阐述了法律的初衷与完整性……
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……背景。这其实是一段相当精彩的历史。从你的措辞来看，你对反垄断的理解源自 Robert Bork，而且长期以来一直是主流思想。去读读他的《The Antitrust Paradox》，看看我们是怎么走到今天这一步的，以及为什么法院在过去 40 年里会这样判决。现任 FTC 主席 Lina Khan 在进入政府工作之前其实是一名学者……
…background. Its actually a pretty fascinating history. Judging by your phrasing, your interpretation of antitrust stems from Robert Bork and has been the mainstream thought for a long time. Read The Antitrust Paradox by him to see how we got here and why the courts have acted how they have for the past 40 years. The current chair of the FTC, Lina Khan, was actually an academic prior to working for the government…
我同意这篇文章中的一些观点，但关于这个话题绝对有更好的参考资料。文章中提到的那篇论文《Amazon's Antitrust Paradox》论述得非常详尽，即使像我这样没有经济学背景的人读起来也毫不费力。那篇论文的核心观点是，现代反垄断立法只看价格，当……
I agree with some of the points being made in this article, but there's definitely better resources on this topic. The paper mentioned in the article, "Amazon's Antitrust Paradox", is very thorough and easy to read even for someone (like me) who doesn't have a background in economics. The key point made in that paper is that modern antitrust legislation only looks at price when…
……如果大家愿意去请教一下律师或者反垄断学者就好了，这种专业出处对于理解这个问题非常重要。比如，几乎所有人读了《Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox》（https://www.yalelawjournal.org/note/amazons-antitrust-parado...）都会收获更多，能明白为什么 Epic 当初要用那种特定、精准的方式去布局——因为他们让 Apple 下架了一个明明……的应用商店页面
…people had bothered talking to a lawyer or an anti-trust scholar, a provenance that would matter a lot to understanding this issue. For example, almost everyone here will learn more reading "Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox" (https://www.yalelawjournal.org/note/amazons-antitrust-parado...) to understand why Epic set things up the particular, exact way they did - because they got Apple to take down a store page that clearly…
《Amazon's Antitrust Paradox》绝对值得一读。<https://www.yalelawjournal.org/note/amazons-antitrust-parado...>
Amazon's Antitrust Paradox is definitely worth a read. <https://www.yalelawjournal.org/note/amazons-antitrust-parado...>
……基础设施和能够补贴亏损的现金流。就连零利率政策（ZIRP）也无法抵消这一点。掠夺性定价是违法的，这是有原因的。强烈推荐 Lina Khan 的《Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox》
…infrastructure and revenue streams that can subsidize their losses. Even ZIRP couldn’t counteract that. There is a reason that predatory pricing is illegal. Would strongly recommend Lina Khan’s “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox”
Bork 本身就是反对反垄断法的。要是他支持反垄断那才叫新闻。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Antitrust_Paradox
Bork is anti-antitrust. It would be news were he in favor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Antitrust_Paradox