The questions I listed are specifically addressed in works like The Social Construction of Reality[1] and Frame Analysis[2]. From what I gather, they are widely read influential works and to put one in terms of the other, helped me frame modern social currents in a more through understanding. 1. Berger 1967 ISBN13:978-0385058988…
…Goffman's analysis of self-consciousness. Both are mystics in the sense that they investigate the conditions causing someone to lose self-consciousness. But Goffman is what I would call a pessimystic, for in Frame Analysis (1974:378ff) he examines how the self disappears in the "negative experience" that results when situational contradictions increase its stress; Csikszentmihalyi is an optimystic, for he ex- amines how…
…level of indirection. For any topic, I can generate a frame[2] in which it takes a non-neutral position. That's why neutrality doesn't exist. 1. teach the controversy, both sides! (in jest) 2. See Frame Analysis, Erving Goffman
我列出的这些问题，在《现实的社会构建》[1]和《框架分析》[2]等著作中都有具体探讨。据我所知，它们都是流传极广、影响深远的作品，把它们两相对照着看，帮我把现代社会思潮放进一个框架里，理解得更透彻了。1. Berger 1967 ISBN13:978-0385058988……
The questions I listed are specifically addressed in works like The Social Construction of Reality[1] and Frame Analysis[2]. From what I gather, they are widely read influential works and to put one in terms of the other, helped me frame modern social currents in a more through understanding. 1. Berger 1967 ISBN13:978-0385058988…
……戈夫曼对自我意识的分析。两人都是神秘主义者，因为他们都在探究导致人失去自我意识的条件。但戈夫曼是我所谓的“悲观神秘主义者”，因为在《框架分析》（1974:378及后）中，他探讨了当情境矛盾加剧自我压力时，自我如何在“负面体验”中消解；而奇克森特米哈伊则是个“乐观神秘主义者”，因为他研究的是……
…Goffman's analysis of self-consciousness. Both are mystics in the sense that they investigate the conditions causing someone to lose self-consciousness. But Goffman is what I would call a pessimystic, for in Frame Analysis (1974:378ff) he examines how the self disappears in the "negative experience" that results when situational contradictions increase its stress; Csikszentmihalyi is an optimystic, for he ex- amines how…
……间接寻址层。对于任何话题，我都能构造出一个框架[2]，让它在其中带上非中立的立场。这就是为什么中立根本不存在。1. 把争议两方都教一教！（开个玩笑）2. 参见 Erving Goffman 的《框架分析》
…level of indirection. For any topic, I can generate a frame[2] in which it takes a non-neutral position. That's why neutrality doesn't exist. 1. teach the controversy, both sides! (in jest) 2. See Frame Analysis, Erving Goffman