对“智慧城市”很深刻的反思与历史回顾。亚当·格林菲尔德（Adam Greenfield）的书《反对智慧城市（城市是供你使用的）》（Against the Smart City (The city is here for you to use)）是任何对这个话题感兴趣的人的必读书。http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18626431-against-the-smar...
Thoughtful critique / history of Smart Cities. Adam Greenfield's book 'Against the Smart City (The city is here for you to use)' is required reading for anyone interested in the topic. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18626431-against-the-smar...
……权益证明（proof-of-stake），它能降低约 99.9% 的能耗。是因为作者不知道呢，还是因为他只想展现论点的单方面？这篇“文章”可是《反对智慧城市》（Against the smart city）的作者写的。所以我更倾向于认为他只是为了骗点击量、只展现自己想展现的一面。
…proof-of-stake which will reduce the power requirements by ~99,9%. Because the author doesn't know or because he wants to only show one side of the argument? The "article" is written by the author of: "Against the smart city". So I'm gonna go with him just wanting clicks and to show only one side of the argument.
对“智慧城市”很深刻的反思与历史回顾。亚当·格林菲尔德（Adam Greenfield）的书《反对智慧城市（城市是供你使用的）》（Against the Smart City (The city is here for you to use)）是任何对这个话题感兴趣的人的必读书。http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18626431-against-the-smar...
Thoughtful critique / history of Smart Cities. Adam Greenfield's book 'Against the Smart City (The city is here for you to use)' is required reading for anyone interested in the topic. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18626431-against-the-smar...
……权益证明（proof-of-stake），它能降低约 99.9% 的能耗。是因为作者不知道呢，还是因为他只想展现论点的单方面？这篇“文章”可是《反对智慧城市》（Against the smart city）的作者写的。所以我更倾向于认为他只是为了骗点击量、只展现自己想展现的一面。
…proof-of-stake which will reduce the power requirements by ~99,9%. Because the author doesn't know or because he wants to only show one side of the argument? The "article" is written by the author of: "Against the smart city". So I'm gonna go with him just wanting clicks and to show only one side of the argument.