……1913 Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie》）：http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Weyl – 海森堡 - 《Physics and Philosophy》：http://www.amazon.com/Physics-Philosophy-Revolution-Modern-S... – 戴维·玻姆 - 《Wholeness and the Implicate Order》：http://www.amazon.com/Wholeness-Implicate-Order-David-Bohm/d... 这里有一本更现代的……
…1913 Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie"): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Weyl – Heisenberg - "Physics and Philosophy": http://www.amazon.com/Physics-Philosophy-Revolution-Modern-S... – David Bohm - "Wholeness and the Implicate Order": http://www.amazon.com/Wholeness-Implicate-Order-David-Bohm/d... Here's a more modern…
……层面”。像“现实”、“幻象”这类词，用在量子层面和经典宏观层面上时，含义大相径庭。想搞明白这些，最好的书莫过于 Werner Heisenberg 的经典著作《Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science》。光是 Paul Davies 写的前言就值回书价了，因为他把核心问题梳理得非常清晰。在基本层面上，量子系统具有……
…level". Words like "Reality", "Illusion" etc. mean quite different things when applied at quantum level vs. classical-macro level. The best book to get a grasp on the above is Werner Heisenberg's classic Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. The introduction by Paul Davies itself is worth the price of the book since it highlights the main issues quite clearly. At the fundamental level quantum systems have…
……极力想通过一个 Theory，把观测证据和它的数学模型完美契合起来。想开开眼界的话，先读读勒内·笛卡尔的《第一哲学沉思录》（Meditations on First Philosophy），然后再读 Werner Heisenberg 的《Physics and Philosophy》。
…try very hard to have both observed evidence and a mathematical model of it match cleanly via a Theory. For your edification, read first "Meditations on First Philosophy by Rene Descartes" followed by "Physics and Philosophy by Werner Heisenberg".
……他们所熟悉的科学描述。而当哲学家试图用他们的一般性原理来指导我们宇宙是如何运作的时候，他们错得更离谱了。Heisenberg 的《Physics and Philosophy》是对这种荒谬性很好的入门读物。他在书里花了大篇幅来展示康德是如何推导出一堆关于物理学的错误结论，而康德当年还以为基于一般原理这些结论肯定是对的。
…the descriptions of the science that they're familiar with. And when philosophers try to apply their general principles to instruct is about how the universe works, they're even more wrong. Heisenberg's Physics and Philosophy is a good introduction to this wrongness. He devotes a good deal of it to showing how Kant derived so many wrong conclusions about physics that he thought must be true because of general principles.
……不甘于无聊（这在费曼的回忆录里体现得淋漓尽致）。第二点是把每个人都当作可以学习的对象（顺便说一句，Heisenberg 在《Physics and Philosophy》里给人的感觉正是如此）。如果你见谁都能学到东西，又耐不住无聊，只要别人不这么做，你很快就会比其他人聪明得多。
…an unwillingness to be bored (something that really comes through in Feynman's memoires). The second is regarding everyone as someone to learn from (Heisenberg btw comes across this way very much in "Physics and Philosophy"). If you go around learning from everyone, and refuse to be bored, you will quite quickly become smarter than everyone else if they refuse to do the same.
……不过我一眼就能看出来的是，他们想测试的某些技能根本无法被客观评估。我脑海里冒出的最大的一项就是 pattern recognition。如果你还没读过的话，我觉得 Heisenberg 的《Physics and Philosophy》在这里是必读书目，因为他关于数据与理论之间关系的讨论和这个直接相关。当我们识别出一个模式时，我们实际做的是把假设投射到……
…though that I can spot immediately is that some skills they want to test cannot be objectively tested. The big one that comes to mind is pattern recognition. If you haven't read it, I think Heisenberg's "Physics and Philosophy" is a must read here because his discussions of the relationship between data and theory are directly relevant to this. When we recognize a pattern what we actually do is we project assumptions onto…
……1913 Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie》）：http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Weyl – 海森堡 - 《Physics and Philosophy》：http://www.amazon.com/Physics-Philosophy-Revolution-Modern-S... – 戴维·玻姆 - 《Wholeness and the Implicate Order》：http://www.amazon.com/Wholeness-Implicate-Order-David-Bohm/d... 这里有一本更现代的……
…1913 Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie"): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Weyl – Heisenberg - "Physics and Philosophy": http://www.amazon.com/Physics-Philosophy-Revolution-Modern-S... – David Bohm - "Wholeness and the Implicate Order": http://www.amazon.com/Wholeness-Implicate-Order-David-Bohm/d... Here's a more modern…
……层面”。像“现实”、“幻象”这类词，用在量子层面和经典宏观层面上时，含义大相径庭。想搞明白这些，最好的书莫过于 Werner Heisenberg 的经典著作《Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science》。光是 Paul Davies 写的前言就值回书价了，因为他把核心问题梳理得非常清晰。在基本层面上，量子系统具有……
…level". Words like "Reality", "Illusion" etc. mean quite different things when applied at quantum level vs. classical-macro level. The best book to get a grasp on the above is Werner Heisenberg's classic Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. The introduction by Paul Davies itself is worth the price of the book since it highlights the main issues quite clearly. At the fundamental level quantum systems have…
……极力想通过一个 Theory，把观测证据和它的数学模型完美契合起来。想开开眼界的话，先读读勒内·笛卡尔的《第一哲学沉思录》（Meditations on First Philosophy），然后再读 Werner Heisenberg 的《Physics and Philosophy》。
…try very hard to have both observed evidence and a mathematical model of it match cleanly via a Theory. For your edification, read first "Meditations on First Philosophy by Rene Descartes" followed by "Physics and Philosophy by Werner Heisenberg".
……他们所熟悉的科学描述。而当哲学家试图用他们的一般性原理来指导我们宇宙是如何运作的时候，他们错得更离谱了。Heisenberg 的《Physics and Philosophy》是对这种荒谬性很好的入门读物。他在书里花了大篇幅来展示康德是如何推导出一堆关于物理学的错误结论，而康德当年还以为基于一般原理这些结论肯定是对的。
…the descriptions of the science that they're familiar with. And when philosophers try to apply their general principles to instruct is about how the universe works, they're even more wrong. Heisenberg's Physics and Philosophy is a good introduction to this wrongness. He devotes a good deal of it to showing how Kant derived so many wrong conclusions about physics that he thought must be true because of general principles.
……不甘于无聊（这在费曼的回忆录里体现得淋漓尽致）。第二点是把每个人都当作可以学习的对象（顺便说一句，Heisenberg 在《Physics and Philosophy》里给人的感觉正是如此）。如果你见谁都能学到东西，又耐不住无聊，只要别人不这么做，你很快就会比其他人聪明得多。
…an unwillingness to be bored (something that really comes through in Feynman's memoires). The second is regarding everyone as someone to learn from (Heisenberg btw comes across this way very much in "Physics and Philosophy"). If you go around learning from everyone, and refuse to be bored, you will quite quickly become smarter than everyone else if they refuse to do the same.
……不过我一眼就能看出来的是，他们想测试的某些技能根本无法被客观评估。我脑海里冒出的最大的一项就是 pattern recognition。如果你还没读过的话，我觉得 Heisenberg 的《Physics and Philosophy》在这里是必读书目，因为他关于数据与理论之间关系的讨论和这个直接相关。当我们识别出一个模式时，我们实际做的是把假设投射到……
…though that I can spot immediately is that some skills they want to test cannot be objectively tested. The big one that comes to mind is pattern recognition. If you haven't read it, I think Heisenberg's "Physics and Philosophy" is a must read here because his discussions of the relationship between data and theory are directly relevant to this. When we recognize a pattern what we actually do is we project assumptions onto…