……科学知识的社会学维度同样非常重要、需要理解，但像波普尔（Popper）这类人却低估了这一点。我在这方面的绝大部分思考都深受两本书的影响，两本都是开山之作：一本是 Steven Shapin 和 Simon Schaffer 写的《利维坦与空气泵》（Leviathan and the Air-Pump）；另一本是 Paul Feyerabend 的《反对方法》（Against Method）。我建议你两本都读读。
…sociological dimension of scientific knowledge is equally important to understand, but underappreciated by people like Popper. Most of my thinking here has been shaped by two books, both seminal works: one is "Leviathan and the Air-Pump" by Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer; the other is "Against Method" by Paul Feyerabend. I recommend you read them both.
…"every living physicist" doesn't immediately know "exactly what that result meant." It not nearly as rational and positivist as you would think. Science is a human activity. Read some Thomas Kuhn or Leviathan and the Air-Pump for starters: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan_and_the_Air-Pump And you should read a basic primer in psychology. You claim there have never been "central, unifying, falsifiable" theories that…
……Virginia Eubanks 和 Adrian Mackenzie 都是我很喜欢的作者。《Your Computer Is on Fire》我很想读，但还没顾得上看。说实话，我觉得 90% 的劣质技术炒作，在《利维坦与空气泵》这本老经典里早就说透了。
…Virginia Eubanks, and Adrian Mackenzie are some of my favorites. I'm excited to read Your Computer Is on Fire but I haven't gotten to it yet. Heck, I think 90% of the bad tech hype is covered the old classic Leviathan and the Air-Pump.
Replication as part of scientific consensus-building dates back at least to the air-pump experiments of 17th century. See e.g. “Leviathan and the Air-Pump”
……科学知识的社会学维度同样非常重要、需要理解，但像波普尔（Popper）这类人却低估了这一点。我在这方面的绝大部分思考都深受两本书的影响，两本都是开山之作：一本是 Steven Shapin 和 Simon Schaffer 写的《利维坦与空气泵》（Leviathan and the Air-Pump）；另一本是 Paul Feyerabend 的《反对方法》（Against Method）。我建议你两本都读读。
…sociological dimension of scientific knowledge is equally important to understand, but underappreciated by people like Popper. Most of my thinking here has been shaped by two books, both seminal works: one is "Leviathan and the Air-Pump" by Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer; the other is "Against Method" by Paul Feyerabend. I recommend you read them both.
……并不是“所有活着的物理学家”都能立马“准确搞懂那个结果意味着什么”。科学远没有你想象的那么理性和实证主义。科学是一种人类活动。入门可以先读读托马斯·库恩（Thomas Kuhn）的书，或者《利维坦与空气泵》：http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan_and_the_Air-Pump。另外你也该读读心理学入门基础。你声称从来没有过“核心的、统一的、可证伪的”理论，这……
…"every living physicist" doesn't immediately know "exactly what that result meant." It not nearly as rational and positivist as you would think. Science is a human activity. Read some Thomas Kuhn or Leviathan and the Air-Pump for starters: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan_and_the_Air-Pump And you should read a basic primer in psychology. You claim there have never been "central, unifying, falsifiable" theories that…
……Virginia Eubanks 和 Adrian Mackenzie 都是我很喜欢的作者。《Your Computer Is on Fire》我很想读，但还没顾得上看。说实话，我觉得 90% 的劣质技术炒作，在《利维坦与空气泵》这本老经典里早就说透了。
…Virginia Eubanks, and Adrian Mackenzie are some of my favorites. I'm excited to read Your Computer Is on Fire but I haven't gotten to it yet. Heck, I think 90% of the bad tech hype is covered the old classic Leviathan and the Air-Pump.
《利维坦与空气泵：霍布斯、波义耳与实验生活》（Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life）。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan_and_the_Air-Pump
Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan_and_the_Air-Pump
作为建立科学共识一部分的“可重复性”（Replication），至少可以追溯到 17 世纪的空气泵实验。参见《利维坦与空气泵》等著作。
Replication as part of scientific consensus-building dates back at least to the air-pump experiments of 17th century. See e.g. “Leviathan and the Air-Pump”