……根本没有市场这一说。哪怕是更激进的自由意志主义者，通常也会认同政府拥有警察权是必要的，一部分原因是为了确保产权得到尊重。不对。去读读弗里德曼的《自由的机制》（The Machinery of Freedom）这本入门书吧，它讲了为什么这根本没必要。
…there is no marketplace. Even the more extreme libertarians will generally agree that it is necessary for government to have police powers, partly to ensure that property rights are respected. No. Read Machinery of Freedom by Friedman for a primer on why this is not necessary.
更好不好说，但作为替代方案，我真的强烈推荐大卫·弗里德曼的《自由的机制》（The Machinery of Freedom，http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machinery_of_Freedom）。构思非常周全，而且细节拉满。
Better is arguable, but I really do recommend The Machinery of Freedom by David Friedman (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machinery_of_Freedom) for an alternative. It's well thought out and very detailed.
The Machinery of Freedom (David Friedman) -- Great book on a potential anarcho-capitalist society and how we could push the US government in that direction. The Game (Neil Strauss) -- See nopassrecover's response; he explained…
David Friedman's The Machinery Of Freedom goes into detail about these kinds of scenarios. There is far too much there to summarize here. The one point I will make is that, when people imagine anarchy, they imagine the society we have now, and…
…more functions and people come to think of them as having to be done by governments, even if they could be done better by private entities. That's why I have several times referenced David Friedman's The Machinery Of Freedom, which is a serious attempt to undertake this task of imagination in some detail. It's not something that can be done within the scope of a HN comment.
……根本没有市场这一说。哪怕是更激进的自由意志主义者，通常也会认同政府拥有警察权是必要的，一部分原因是为了确保产权得到尊重。不对。去读读弗里德曼的《自由的机制》（The Machinery of Freedom）这本入门书吧，它讲了为什么这根本没必要。
…there is no marketplace. Even the more extreme libertarians will generally agree that it is necessary for government to have police powers, partly to ensure that property rights are respected. No. Read Machinery of Freedom by Friedman for a primer on why this is not necessary.
更好不好说，但作为替代方案，我真的强烈推荐大卫·弗里德曼的《自由的机制》（The Machinery of Freedom，http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machinery_of_Freedom）。构思非常周全，而且细节拉满。
Better is arguable, but I really do recommend The Machinery of Freedom by David Friedman (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machinery_of_Freedom) for an alternative. It's well thought out and very detailed.
《自由的机制》（大卫·弗里德曼）——关于潜在的无政府资本主义社会以及我们如何推动美国政府朝那个方向发展的神作。《把妹达人》（The Game，尼尔·斯特劳斯）——参见 nopassrecover 的回复；他解释了……
The Machinery of Freedom (David Friedman) -- Great book on a potential anarcho-capitalist society and how we could push the US government in that direction. The Game (Neil Strauss) -- See nopassrecover's response; he explained…
大卫·弗里德曼的《自由的机制》对这类场景做了非常详尽的探讨。内容实在太多了，这里根本概括不完。我只想说一点：当人们设想无政府状态时，他们想象的其实是我们现在的社会，然后……
David Friedman's The Machinery Of Freedom goes into detail about these kinds of scenarios. There is far too much there to summarize here. The one point I will make is that, when people imagine anarchy, they imagine the society we have now, and…
……更多职能，人们渐渐认为这些必须由政府来做，哪怕私营实体其实能做得更好。这就是为什么我多次提到大卫·弗里德曼的《自由的机制》，它是一次严肃的尝试，试图在相当具体的细节上展开这种想象。这绝不是一条 HN 评论的篇幅能说清楚的。
…more functions and people come to think of them as having to be done by governments, even if they could be done better by private entities. That's why I have several times referenced David Friedman's The Machinery Of Freedom, which is a serious attempt to undertake this task of imagination in some detail. It's not something that can be done within the scope of a HN comment.
对啊。去读读大卫·弗里德曼的《自由的机制》，里面有更多关于那种法律的论述。
Yeah. Read The Machinery of Freedom by David Friedman for more on that sort of law.