风险大转移
The Great Risk Shift
Jacob S. Hacker · 初版 2006 年
1人推荐
3位读者提及
3次提及
我们正在目睹经济风险从广泛的保障体系大规模转移至美国家庭脆弱的资产负债表上。本书阐释了“The Great Risk Shift”的起因与后果，以及可以采取哪些措施来扭转这一局面。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
The Great Risk Shift
Jacob S. Hacker · 初版 2006 年
我们正在目睹经济风险从广泛的保障体系大规模转移至美国家庭脆弱的资产负债表上。本书阐释了“The Great Risk Shift”的起因与后果，以及可以采取哪些措施来扭转这一局面。
正在加载完整评论……
……过去几十年里反复出现的趋势。共享经济公司只是这一加速趋势中的又一块拼图而已。耶鲁大学政治学教授 Jacob Hacker 写过一本相关的书，叫《巨大的风险转移》（The Great Risk Shift），你可能会觉得读起来很有意思，有助于理清你在这篇文章中表达的想法（在我这粗人看来，你说得一针见血）。
…recurring trend over the last few decades. Sharing economy companies are only one more piece in an accelerating trend. Yale Political Science professor Jacob Hacker wrote a book about this, called "The Great Risk Shift", you might find that an interesting read to help work through the ideas you've expressed in this piece (which, in my crude opinion, are on point).
怎么会呢？所有欧洲社会体制里全都是这么归类和组织的。这也是耶鲁大学的 Jacob Hacker 在《巨大的风险转移》（The Great Risk Shift）中讨论美国社会政策时所用的框架：https://www.amazon.com/Great-Risk-Shift-Economic-Insecurity/...（那篇 Medium 文章是我写的）
How so? It's exactly the way it's grouped and organized in all European social systems. It's also the framework used by Yale University's Jacob Hacker in "The Great Risk Shift" to discuss US social policy: https://www.amazon.com/Great-Risk-Shift-Economic-Insecurity/... (I wrote the Medium article)
……大多数工作的常态。公共部门的工作没理由享有更多保障。私营部门的工作没理由缺乏保障，更没理由让这成为大多数工作的常态。例如可以参考 Jacob S. Hacker 的《巨大的风险转移》（The Great Risk Shift, 2006）：<https://calitreview.com/the-disquieting-effects-of-the-new-e...> <https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/books/review/Leonhardt.t....>
…state of most jobs. There’s no reason public jobs should have more protection. There's no reason private jobs should have less protection, or that this be the status of most jobs. See for example The Great Risk Shift, Jacob S. Hacker (2006): <https://calitreview.com/the-disquieting-effects-of-the-new-e...> <https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/books/review/Leonhardt.t....>