
母亲的更多劳动
More work for mother
Ruth Schwartz Cowan · 初版 1983 年
4人推荐
5位读者提及
14次提及
该版本于1989年完成。新增材料由 Robert M. Young 委约并编辑,由 Martin Klopstock 和 Selina O'Grady 为 Free Association Books 制作完成。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……

More work for mother
Ruth Schwartz Cowan · 初版 1983 年
该版本于1989年完成。新增材料由 Robert M. Young 委约并编辑,由 Martin Klopstock 和 Selina O'Grady 为 Free Association Books 制作完成。
正在加载完整评论……
……压根就没发生。除此以外,至少在美国,家务劳动的实际需求并没有随着技术发展而减少。很长一段时间里,反倒是持家的标准不断水涨船高:http://www.amazon.com/More-Work-For-Mother-Technology/dp/046....
…first place. Besides that, at least in the U.S. the actual demand of housework did not go down with technology. For a long time, the standards for homemaking just went up instead: http://www.amazon.com/More-Work-For-Mother-Technology/dp/046....
参见:鲁丝·施瓦茨·考恩(Ruth Schwartz Cowan)著《给母亲增加更多工作:从明火灶到微波炉的家务技术讽刺史》(More Work For Mother)
See: More Work For Mother: The Ironies Of Household Technology From The Open Hearth To The Microwave By Ruth Schwartz Cowan
有一本关于家政技术历史的绝佳好书,叫《给母亲增加更多工作》(More work for mother)。它详述了我们创造的家务科技越多,工作就越从男主人转移到女主人身上,标准也随之拔高。三百年前,全职妻子大约要做……
There's an excellent book about the history of domestic technology called "More work for mother." It details how the more domestic tech we created, the more work shifted from the man of the house to the lady of the house and standards were raised Three hundred years ago, full-time wives did about…
你可能会喜欢《给母亲增加更多工作》这本书。(我不知道为什么这条被踩了,但这本书讲的就是家务劳动如何从男性转移到女性身上,从而把男性解放出来去打工挣钱的历史。)http://micheleincalifornia.blogspot.com/2017/03/the-history-...
You might enjoy the book More Work for Mother. (I don't know why this is being downvoted, but the book is about the history of how domestic labor was shifted off men to women to free men up to get paid jobs.) http://micheleincalifornia.blogspot.com/2017/03/the-history-...
……他们的处理方式也和我不同。如果不是因为感觉受到了难堪且无端的攻击,大家本可以在这里找到很好的共识。如果你感兴趣的话,《给母亲增加更多工作》这本书详述了300年的家政技术史。它在某种程度上认同你的观点,即女性或许应该学着稍微放宽心一点。但它也指出,迫使女性如此拼命工作的压力其实来自于现实……
…they also did not handle it the same way I would. If it weren't for feeling attacked in an ugly and gratuitous way, there would be good common ground to be found there. If you are interested, the book "More work for mother" details 300 years of history of household tech. It partly agrees with you that maybe women should learn to lighten up a hair. But it also asserts the pressure for women to work so hard comes from real…
……忽略了它。结果我们完全把它轻视掉了,甚至没意识到它的存在。这是一个巨大的盲区。有一本讲家务技术历史的有趣书叫《给母亲增加更多工作》。它详细记录了在过去300年左右的时间里,我们是如何彻底重构了“工作”的定义,以此来划分家务职责和有偿劳动的。随着货币的兴起,我们需要将男性劳动力从……中解放出来
…of it. So we wind up discounting it entirely and not even recognizing that it existed. It's a huge blind spot. There's an interesting book about the history of technology for doing housework called "More Work for Mother." It details how in the past 300 years or so, we have very much reframed work in order to divide up domestic responsibilities and paid work. With the rise of money, we needed to free up male labor from…