对——我觉得这完全可以用模因脑吸虫的恶性蔓延来解释，根本不需要什么阴谋论。我推荐读读 Elizabeth Sandifer 的《Neoreaction a Basilisk》来摸清头绪（可不仅是因为我的名字出现在第一句话里哦）。
yeah - I think it's fully explained by a virulent plague of memetic brain worms, and doesn't need a conspiracy. I recommend Neoreaction a Basilisk by Elizabeth Sandifer to get a handle on it (and not just because my name's in the first sentence).
关于大写的“理性主义”（Rationalism）相关话题，有史以来写得最有用的一本书大概就是 Elizabeth Sandifer 写的《Neoreaction, A Basilisk: Essays on and Around the Alt-Right》[1] 了。虽然这本书名义上的主题是“另类右翼”（Alt-Right），但其中更多篇幅其实是在讲大写 R 的 Rationalist 社群和其中的人物……
Probably the most useful book ever written about topics adjacent to capital-R Rationalism is "Neoreaction, A Basilisk: Essays on and Around the Alt-Right" [1], by Elizabeth Sandifer. Though the topic of the book is nominally the Alt-Right, a lot more of it is about the capital-R Rationalist communities and individuals…
……http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2010/02/from-mi... ）问题在于现实世界根本不是那么运转的，而所有有趣的事情无一例外都发生在秩序与混乱的边界上。（Phil Sandifer 最近的新书《Neoreaction a Basilisk》对 Yarvin 信仰体系的这一要点进行了相当详尽的探讨。）
…http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2010/02/from-mi... ) The trouble is that the real world doesn't work like that, and literally all the interesting stuff happens at the boundary between order and chaos. (Phil Sandifer's recent book Neoreaction a Basilisk goes into this point about Yarvin's belief system in some detail.)
> 首先我想强调一下，再次回到这个话题让我感到多么的痛不欲生。[...] 既然大家似乎都很热衷于指出《Neoreaction a Basilisk》实际上根本没怎么聊 Scott Siskind（也就是 Scott Alexander），那就再写一篇该死的文章吧。作者当然不欠任何人另一篇文章，但要是能言之有物那就再好不过了……
> I would like to begin by stressing how deeply miserable I am to be back on this beat. [...] Since people seem to love pointing out that Neoreaction a Basilisk does not actually talk about Scott Siskind, aka Scott Alexander, here’s another goddamn essay. The author certainly didn’t owe anyone another article, but it would be nice if there was a point to it…
……理性主义者们曾经弄出的东西，其中《Neoreaction and the Basilisk》算是个头最大的。评估非主流思想的一部分要领，就是你必须极度擅长忽视糟糕的想法。所以当有人写了本叫《Neoreaction: a Basilisk》的书并声称它是关于理性的，我就会做一笔极其简单的期望值计算。
…rationalists ever were, Neoreaction and the Basilisk being the biggest. Part of evaluating unusual ideas is that you have to get really good at ignoring bad ones. So when somebody writes a book called "Neoreaction: a Basilisk" and claims that it's about rationality, I make a very simple expected-value calculation.
对——我觉得这完全可以用模因脑吸虫的恶性蔓延来解释，根本不需要什么阴谋论。我推荐读读 Elizabeth Sandifer 的《Neoreaction a Basilisk》来摸清头绪（可不仅是因为我的名字出现在第一句话里哦）。
yeah - I think it's fully explained by a virulent plague of memetic brain worms, and doesn't need a conspiracy. I recommend Neoreaction a Basilisk by Elizabeth Sandifer to get a handle on it (and not just because my name's in the first sentence).
关于大写的“理性主义”（Rationalism）相关话题，有史以来写得最有用的一本书大概就是 Elizabeth Sandifer 写的《Neoreaction, A Basilisk: Essays on and Around the Alt-Right》[1] 了。虽然这本书名义上的主题是“另类右翼”（Alt-Right），但其中更多篇幅其实是在讲大写 R 的 Rationalist 社群和其中的人物……
Probably the most useful book ever written about topics adjacent to capital-R Rationalism is "Neoreaction, A Basilisk: Essays on and Around the Alt-Right" [1], by Elizabeth Sandifer. Though the topic of the book is nominally the Alt-Right, a lot more of it is about the capital-R Rationalist communities and individuals…
……http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2010/02/from-mi... ）问题在于现实世界根本不是那么运转的，而所有有趣的事情无一例外都发生在秩序与混乱的边界上。（Phil Sandifer 最近的新书《Neoreaction a Basilisk》对 Yarvin 信仰体系的这一要点进行了相当详尽的探讨。）
…http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2010/02/from-mi... ) The trouble is that the real world doesn't work like that, and literally all the interesting stuff happens at the boundary between order and chaos. (Phil Sandifer's recent book Neoreaction a Basilisk goes into this point about Yarvin's belief system in some detail.)
> 首先我想强调一下，再次回到这个话题让我感到多么的痛不欲生。[...] 既然大家似乎都很热衷于指出《Neoreaction a Basilisk》实际上根本没怎么聊 Scott Siskind（也就是 Scott Alexander），那就再写一篇该死的文章吧。作者当然不欠任何人另一篇文章，但要是能言之有物那就再好不过了……
> I would like to begin by stressing how deeply miserable I am to be back on this beat. [...] Since people seem to love pointing out that Neoreaction a Basilisk does not actually talk about Scott Siskind, aka Scott Alexander, here’s another goddamn essay. The author certainly didn’t owe anyone another article, but it would be nice if there was a point to it…
……理性主义者们曾经弄出的东西，其中《Neoreaction and the Basilisk》算是个头最大的。评估非主流思想的一部分要领，就是你必须极度擅长忽视糟糕的想法。所以当有人写了本叫《Neoreaction: a Basilisk》的书并声称它是关于理性的，我就会做一笔极其简单的期望值计算。
…rationalists ever were, Neoreaction and the Basilisk being the biggest. Part of evaluating unusual ideas is that you have to get really good at ignoring bad ones. So when somebody writes a book called "Neoreaction: a Basilisk" and claims that it's about rationality, I make a very simple expected-value calculation.