《产业、政府、教育的新经济学》封面

产业、政府、教育的新经济学

The new economics for industry, government, education

W. Edwards Deming · 初版 1993 年

2人推荐
4位读者提及
4次提及

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • 作为爱德华·戴明的铁粉,我推荐这几本书:- 《戴明管理思想精粹:质量管理之父的领导力原则》(The Essential Deming: Leadership Principles from the Father of Quality):https://www.amazon.com/Essential-Deming-Leadership-Principle... - 《新经济学:面向工业、政府与教育》(The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education):https://www.amazon.com/Economics-Industry-Government-Educati... - 《丰田模式:精益制造的14项管理原则》(The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer):https://www.amazon.com/Toyota-Way-Management-Principles-Manu...……

    As a huge Ed Deming fan, I'd recommend these books: - The Essential Deming: Leadership Principles from the Father of Quality: https://www.amazon.com/Essential-Deming-Leadership-Principle... - The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education: https://www.amazon.com/Economics-Industry-Government-Educati... - The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer: https://www.amazon.com/Toyota-Way-Management-Principles-Manu...…

  • ……并不是我合作就会吃亏的囚徒困境。我甚至觉得,如果不保持步调一致,这事儿肯定得黄。弗雷德里克·拉卢的《重塑组织》(Reinventing Organizations)和爱德华·戴明的《新经济学:面向工业、政府与教育》(The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education)(简介见:https://apenwarr.ca/log/20161226)让我直觉上感到,这种模式至少在企业层面是行得通的。

    …is not a prisoner dilemna where I lose if I cooperate. I would even argue that if it wasn't aligned, this would certainly be doomed. The books "Reinventing Organizations" (Frédéric Laloux) and "The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education" (Edward Deming) (intro: https://apenwarr.ca/log/20161226) gave me good intuitions that this can work at least at a corporate level.

  • Avery 启发了我去买戴明的书。唉,我还没来得及读,不过这倒是个好提醒,我该看起来了。(如果我没记错的话,我买的那本是《新经济学:面向工业、政府与教育》。)

    Avery inspired me to buy one of Deming’s books. Alas, I haven’t read it yet, but this was a good reminder that I should do so. (IIRC the one I bought was The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education.)

  • 其实,戴明说的恰恰相反:认为“你无法衡量的东西就无法管理”,这种想法是大错特错的——这是一个代价高昂的神话。出自《新经济学:面向工业、政府与教育》第26页。这句话也不是德鲁克说的。https://medium.com/centre-for-public-impact/what-gets-measur... 这种盲目的“必须衡量、必须衡量”的心态从50年代起就一直被诟病。衡量其实是……

    Actually, Deming said much the opposite: It is wrong to suppose that if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it – a costly myth. p. 26 of The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education It wasn't Drucker either. https://medium.com/centre-for-public-impact/what-gets-measur... This whole mindless must measure, must measure mentality has been criticized since the 50s. Measurement is…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助