
制造共识
Manufacturing consent
Edward S. Herman、Noam Chomsky · 初版 1988 年
175人推荐
407位读者提及
592次提及
为什么值得读
- 剖析西方媒体的既定宣传模式
- 揭露主流媒体对权力的顺从配合
- 帮助读者摆脱群体盲从思维
探讨大众媒体如何受到操纵,从而依据某种潜在的精英阶层共识来报道新闻,而这种共识反过来又影响了对世界不同地区类似事件的呈现方式。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……

Manufacturing consent
Edward S. Herman、Noam Chomsky · 初版 1988 年
探讨大众媒体如何受到操纵,从而依据某种潜在的精英阶层共识来报道新闻,而这种共识反过来又影响了对世界不同地区类似事件的呈现方式。
正在加载完整评论……
……媒体以及其他吃人气饭的行业,其视角和情绪的排布似乎完全是另一回事。在我看来,现在的时代本该让更多人接触到乔姆斯基的《制造共识》(Manufacturing Consent)及类似观点,但我们得到的全都是某种人造的盲从羊群心理。2001年后的政治气候下,我年纪还太小,没能留意到人们行为细节上的种种变化(而且我也从没……
…media, and other popularity-based professions, there seems to be a very different arrangement of perspectives and emotions. In my opinion, this is an era where more people should be exposed to Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent" and similar perspectives, but all we get is some sort of synthetic flock mentality. I was too young to notice all the details in people's behaviour in the post-2001 political climate (and I've never…
乔姆斯基写过不少文章讨论这如何成为一种常态,以及媒体(包括《纽约时报》)通常是如何同流合污的。我推荐他的书《制造共识》(Manufacturing Consent)。它生动地刻画了媒体如何一贯听命于政府的旨意——把我们那些大开杀戒的盟友描绘成英雄,同时极力放大被我们视为……的人所犯下的轻微罪行。
Chomsky has written quite a bit about how this is the norm, and about how the media (including the New York Times) is usually complicit. I recommend his book Manufacturing Consent. It paints a vivid picture of the media consistently doing the government's* bidding by painting our mass murdering allies as heroes, while massively amplifying minor crimes committed by those we consider…
……图书和音乐方面,所以我想问问大家今年的书单都淘到了什么?有哪些特别出彩的?因为生活琐事缠身,我读的书没达到预期那么多,但我特别喜欢这几本:*《制造共识》(Manufacturing Consent,爱德华·赫尔曼与诺姆·乔姆斯基著)*《迷幻体验》(The Psychedelic Experience,蒂莫西·利里著)*《年轻男子与火》(Young Men and Fire,诺曼·麦克林著)
…books and music front, so I wish to ask about how you found your reading lists this year. What stood out? I didn't read as much as I'd have liked due to life complications, but I particularly enjoyed: * Manufacturing Consent (Edward Herman & Noam Chomsky) * The Psychedelic Experience (Timothy Leary) * Young Men and Fire (Normam Maclean)
我觉得有两件挺有意思的事发生了:* 传统大众媒体在“制造共识”上翻车了(这里借用了乔姆斯基的书名,因为我喜欢这本书而且很贴切)。即便大众媒体本该全力阻止,大选还是输给了一位电视名人。Google和Facebook可是一点时间都没耽误……
I think two things happened that are interesting: * Traditional mass media has failed at manufacturing consent (stealing Chomsky's title here because I like the book and it fits). Election was lost to a TV personality even though mass media was supposed to prevent it. Google and Facebook didn't waste any time…
……觉得很难想象一个真正搞科研的科学家的怪异行为和私生活会被报纸大肆报道的世界。真的吗?如今这种手段在媒体上到处都是。去读读《制造共识》(Manufacturing Consent),然后看看西方那套运作起来的“宣传模型”手段在2020年升级成了什么样。至少从80年代起,新闻界在搞这类操纵时就从没遮掩过。相比之下……
…find it hard to imagine a world where the eccentric behaviors and personal lives of practicing scientists would receive newspaper coverage. Really? Such tactics are all over the media nowadays. Read Manufacturing Consent then look for all of the tactics in the western "propaganda model" of operation updated for 2020. The news has never been subtle about this sort of manipulation since at least the 80's. By comparison,…
……公然为其摇旗呐喊。这就是宣传的力量。它极其有效,只要稍微花点力气,就能把粉的说成蓝的,再把蓝的说成黄的。我建议大家都去读读乔姆斯基和赫尔曼的《制造共识》(Manufacturing Consent)。它写成时非常切中时弊,放到今天即便没有更加贴切,也同样针砭时弊。说到乔姆斯基,也可以找找他关于北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)和全球化的文章来看看。他的观点可能也会让你大吃一惊。
…openly advocating it. Such is the power of propaganda. It is extremely effective and could turn pink into blue, and then yellow with some moderate effort. I suggest everyone read Chomsky and Herman's Manufacturing Consent. It was actual when it was written and just as actual even if not more today. Speaking of Chomsky, find his writings on NAFTA and globalization as well. It might also surprise you what he has to say.