虽然我理解并点了赞，但我认为这个回答其实很微妙。推荐读读这本好书：《The Blocksize War: The Battle Over Who Controls Bitcoin's Protocol Rules》https://g.co/kgs/4axiTg
Although I understand and upvoted I think the response is nuanced This is a good read: The Blocksize War: The Battle Over Who Controls Bitcoin's Protocol Rules https://g.co/kgs/4axiTg
……论文《hashcash》。他还在句号后面空两格（或者曾经是这样）。我觉得谁创造的其实无关紧要。如果你读一读比特币的政治史，事情就会清晰得多。《The Blocksize War: The Battle Over Who Controls Bitcoin's Protocol Rules》是一个很好的入门切入点
…the paper “hashcash”. He also leaves two spaces after a period (or used too) I don’t think it really matters who created it. If you read the political story of bitcoin things look a lot clearer. “The Blocksize War: The Battle Over Who Controls Bitcoin's Protocol Rules” is a good entry point
……如果不经过矿工和节点运营者共同采用新客户端，比特币是无法进行不向后兼容的更改的。搞一次 hard fork 需要开发者、矿工和节点运营者的共同协作。Jonathan Bier 写的《The Blocksize War》记录了多次失败的 hard fork 尝试，那些尝试背后有相当多的开发者、大矿工和大型交易所支持。但它们失败了，因为节点运营者并不买账。
…Non-backwards compatible changes cannot be made to Bitcoin without the miners AND node operators adopting the new client. It takes the cooperation of the devs, miners, and node operators to make a hard fork. "The Blocksize War" by Jonathan Bier documents a bunch of failed hard fork attempts that were backed by a good number of devs, large miners, and large exchanges. They failed because the node operators were not on board.
…consensus rules. In fact, a majority of miners did try to strongarm a fork 5 years ago, and they failed, because the users did not agree. There was even been a book written about it. https://www.amazon.com/Blocksize-War-controls-Bitcoins-proto... If they tried again, they would fail again -- literally nobody would agree to a fork whose purpose is to enrich miners at the users' expense.
我觉得这不对。Jonathan Bier 写的《The Blocksize War》这本书对这个话题讲得很好。
I don't think this is correct. The book "The Blocksize War" by Jonathan Bier does a good job of covering this topic.
虽然我理解并点了赞，但我认为这个回答其实很微妙。推荐读读这本好书：《The Blocksize War: The Battle Over Who Controls Bitcoin's Protocol Rules》https://g.co/kgs/4axiTg
Although I understand and upvoted I think the response is nuanced This is a good read: The Blocksize War: The Battle Over Who Controls Bitcoin's Protocol Rules https://g.co/kgs/4axiTg
……论文《hashcash》。他还在句号后面空两格（或者曾经是这样）。我觉得谁创造的其实无关紧要。如果你读一读比特币的政治史，事情就会清晰得多。《The Blocksize War: The Battle Over Who Controls Bitcoin's Protocol Rules》是一个很好的入门切入点
…the paper “hashcash”. He also leaves two spaces after a period (or used too) I don’t think it really matters who created it. If you read the political story of bitcoin things look a lot clearer. “The Blocksize War: The Battle Over Who Controls Bitcoin's Protocol Rules” is a good entry point
……如果不经过矿工和节点运营者共同采用新客户端，比特币是无法进行不向后兼容的更改的。搞一次 hard fork 需要开发者、矿工和节点运营者的共同协作。Jonathan Bier 写的《The Blocksize War》记录了多次失败的 hard fork 尝试，那些尝试背后有相当多的开发者、大矿工和大型交易所支持。但它们失败了，因为节点运营者并不买账。
…Non-backwards compatible changes cannot be made to Bitcoin without the miners AND node operators adopting the new client. It takes the cooperation of the devs, miners, and node operators to make a hard fork. "The Blocksize War" by Jonathan Bier documents a bunch of failed hard fork attempts that were backed by a good number of devs, large miners, and large exchanges. They failed because the node operators were not on board.
……共识规则。事实上，5 年前大多数矿工确实试图强推一次 fork，但他们失败了，因为用户不同意。甚至还有一本书专门写了这事：https://www.amazon.com/Blocksize-War-controls-Bitcoins-proto... 如果他们再试一次，还是会失败——说真的，根本没人会同意一个为了让矿工牟利而牺牲用户利益的 fork。
…consensus rules. In fact, a majority of miners did try to strongarm a fork 5 years ago, and they failed, because the users did not agree. There was even been a book written about it. https://www.amazon.com/Blocksize-War-controls-Bitcoins-proto... If they tried again, they would fail again -- literally nobody would agree to a fork whose purpose is to enrich miners at the users' expense.