Moving Forth——内部机制与 TTL 处理器
Moving Forth - Internals and TTL Processor
Juergen Pintaske、Brad Rodriguez · 初版 2018 年
5人推荐
6位读者提及
7次提及
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
Moving Forth - Internals and TTL Processor
Juergen Pintaske、Brad Rodriguez · 初版 2018 年
正在加载完整评论……
……这玩意儿，哪怕智能手机啥的已经烂大街了。我刚把代码传到了 github：https://github.com/hoytech/tiforth。对于其他想真正搞懂 forth 的人来说，Brad Rodriguez 的《Moving Forth》系列是我读过最好的（而且我觉得打那之后也没啥大变化），里面对“DOES>”的解释极棒，这玩意儿普遍被认为是 forth 内核里最难啃的部分。你可以去读……
…this stuff, despite the ubiquity of smart phones etc. I just uploaded the code to github: https://github.com/hoytech/tiforth To anyone else interested in really understanding forth, Brad Rodriguez's "Moving Forth" series is the best I've ever read (and I don't imagine much has changed since), including a great explanation on "DOES>", widely regarded as the most difficult part of the forth kernel. You can read…
对于那些想要吃透 Forth 实现的人，我强烈推荐 Brad Rodriguez 的《Moving Forth》[1] 系列。但我最喜欢的还是《1st, 3rd and almost 4th》[2]。哦，还有 Loeliger 在这个主题上的经典著作 [3]。[1] https://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/ [2] http://www.ioccc.org/1992/buzzard.2.design…
For those trying to grok Forth implementation, I cannot recommend Brad Rodriguez' "Moving Forth" [1] series enough. But my favorite one is "1st, 3rd and almost 4th" [2]. Oh, and Loeliger's classic book on the subject [3]. [1] https://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/ [2] http://www.ioccc.org/1992/buzzard.2.design…
噢，我超爱 FORTH。Brad Rodriguez 写了一组非常不错的文章叫《Moving FORTH》，探讨了在各种老旧 ISA 上实现 FORTH 的细节。非常值得一读，能让你理解其底层原理以及简洁之美：http://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/moving1.htm…
Oh I love FORTH. Good set of articles here called Moving FORTH by Brad Rodriguez discussing the implementation of FORTH on various legacy ISAs. Worth a read to understand the internals and beauty of the simplicity of it: http://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/moving1.htm…
《Moving Forth》相当不错：http://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/moving1.htm 这个系列一共有 8 部分，你可以在作者的个人网站上看到全部内容以及他写的其他 Forth 文章：http://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/
Moving Forth is pretty good: http://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/moving1.htm There are 8 parts to the series, you can look at all of them and other Forth writings by the author on his website: http://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/
……连同 Joy 一起）是基于间接线程代码（ITC）的，所以 ROP 和基于栈的编程之间的联系其实相当间接（这里玩了个双关）。如果有感兴趣的朋友，Loeliger 的书 [1] 和《Moving Forth》系列 [2] 是这个话题的必读资料。[1]: https://archive.org/details/R.G.LoeligerThreadedInterpretive... [2]: https://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/
…alongside with Joy) is based on indirect-threaded code (ITC), so the connection between ROP and stack-based programming is rather indirect (pun intended). For anyone interested, Book by Loeliger [1] and "Moving Forth" series [2] are essential readings on this topic. [1]: https://archive.org/details/R.G.LoeligerThreadedInterpretive... [2]: https://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/
把 metacompiler（元编译器）描述成针对运行解释型 Forth 目标机的交叉编译器会更准确一些。关于完整的解释，我推荐阅读《Moving Forth》[1]。（那是专门讲解元编译器的部分，其余部分也同样是极好的读物。）[1] https://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/moving4.htm
It would be more accurate to describe a metacompiler as a cross compiler to the machine an interpreted Forth is implemented on. I recommend Moving Forth [1] for the full explanation. (That's the part that addresses metacompliers, the rest is still quite a great book.) [1] https://www.bradrodriguez.com/papers/moving4.htm