再无人可骗
No one left to lie to
Christopher Hitchens · 初版 1999 年
1人推荐
3位读者提及
3次提及
Hitchens分析了Bill Clinton在总统任期内采取的关键行动中所体现的人格特质。Hitchens尤其审视了“莫妮卡·莱温斯基事件”以及Clinton对弹劾程序的应对。书中还分析了“三角策略”（triangulation），即Clinton利用“左派”对抗“右派”以推动个人野心并满足其“权力欲”的政治策略。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……背后的幕后推手，而另一些人则声称她只是默许了而已。你可以在这里读到希钦斯对这桩丑事的记述：http://www.vanityfair.com/news/1999/05/christopher-hitchens-... 或者阅读《没人可以再骗了》（No One Left to Lie to）以了解更深入的细节。现在你不必相信她是在针对指控她丈夫的人发起抹黑行动的带头人，哪怕当时在场的很多人……
…driving force behind it, while others claim she merely acquiesced to it. You can read Hitchens recount the sordid affair here: http://www.vanityfair.com/news/1999/05/christopher-hitchens-... Or read No One Left to Lie to for a more in-depth look. Now you don't have to believe she was the one driving the bus in the smear campaigns against her husband's accusers, even though plenty of people who were there at the time…
……某种程度上的骗子。对我来说那不是什么有意义的指标。家庭 GDP 增长 1 万美元以及气急败坏的老派女教师，对我才是有意义的。不过话虽如此，在读了《没人可以再骗了》（no one left to lie to）（以及看了她的辩论表现）之后，我并没有投票给克林顿。关于特朗普被曝光的那些事，坦白讲并没有冒犯到我，我不介意把话挑明。事实上，以下这些乔·拜登撒过的谎才是我无法忽视的：* 谎称自己毕业于……
…liars of some sort. That is not a meaningful metric for me. The 10k household GDP increase and aggravated school marms, is meaningful to me. However, that said I didn't vote for Clinton after reading 'no one left to lie to' (and her debate performances). Nothing that came out on Trump really offended me, I dont mind plainly stating. In fact here are lies from Joe Biden that I could not look past: * Lied about graduating…
……希钦斯。尽管那篇文章发表于 2005 年，而希钦斯已于 2011 年去世，但如果他今天还活着，我非常怀疑他会说出什么替希拉里·克林顿辩护的话，毕竟他当年写过那本《没人可以再骗了：威廉·杰斐逊·克林顿的三角政术》（No One Left to Lie To: The Triangulations of William Jefferson Clinton）。
…Hitchens. Although the essay was published in 2005 and Hitchens died in 2011, were he alive today, I highly doubt he'd have much to say in the defense of Hillary Clinton, considering he wrote the book "No One Left to Lie To: The Triangulations of William Jefferson Clinton."