挑战者号发射决策
The Challenger launch decision
Diane Vaughan · 初版 1996 年
8人推荐
12位读者提及
17次提及
为什么值得读
- 打破管理层打压工程师的迷思，还原真实机制
- 剖析工程师群体如何一步步让技术异常变得合理
- 揭示紧迫发射日程与组织激励如何层层推向灾难
当挑战者号航天飞机于 1986 年 1 月 28 日发生爆炸时，数百万美国人在这一具有历史意义的瞬间被紧紧联结在一起。许多人至今仍清晰记得，当听到这一悲剧时自己身在何处、在做些什么。在 The Challenger Launch Decision 一书中，Diane Vaughan 重构了导致这一宿命决定的步步历程，打破传统解读，有力证明了 NASA 当时所发生的并非阴谋诡计或失职渎职，而是一场灾难性的决策失误。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
我刚读完黛安·沃恩（Diane Vaughan）的佳作《挑战者号发射决策》（The Challenger Launch Decision），令人惊叹的是，导致瓦萨号沉没的许多问题，竟然同样存在于航天飞机机队中：1. 过度的进度压力：瓦萨号是在极为激进的工期赶工下下水的……
I just finished Diane Vaughan's excellent Challenger Launch Decision, and it's remarkable how many of the same things that doomed the Vasa were also problems with the Shuttle fleet: 1. Excessive schedule pressure: The Vasa was launched with an aggressive schedule that…
……机器，哪怕不可避免的下场是被彻底碾碎，而机器依然不管不顾地轰鸣向前。我以前也是这么想的。直到我读了一本震撼人心的书：黛安·沃恩的《挑战者号发射决策》。我倒想请你去读读那本书，看看能否在那场宿命之日决定发射挑战者号的所有相关人员中，挑出一个心怀恶意的人？哪个工程师没有……
…machine even if the inevitable consequence is that they get crushed, and the machine rolls on, heedless. I used to think in much the same fashion. But then I read a very powerful book: Diane Vaughan's Challenger Launch Decision. I would challenge you to read that book and identify, of all the people involved in the decision to launch the Challenger on that fateful day, which one acted in an evil manner? Which engineer wasn't…
如果有人想了解 NASA 的组织激励机制和制度文化是如何一步步为挑战者号灾难埋下伏笔的，我强烈推荐黛安·沃恩的《挑战者号发射决策》[1]。摘自《纽约时报》的书评[2]：“在《挑战者号发射决策》中，波士顿学院的社会学家黛安·沃恩在罗杰斯委员会和克劳斯·延森（Claus Jensen）止步之处继续深入剖析……
For anyone else interested in how the organizational incentives and institutional culture at NASA helped to set the stage for the Challenger disaster, I highly recommend The Challenger Launch Decision[1] by Diane Vaughan. From the New York Times review[2]: In "The Challenger Launch Decision" Diane Vaughan, a sociologist at Boston College, takes up where the Rogers Commission and Claus Jensen leave…
我最近读了黛安·沃恩的《挑战者号发射决策》[0]。它探讨了导致挑战者号灾难的组织架构。如果你想深入了解发射背后的背景，以及对任何复杂系统……的经验教训
I recently read 'The Challenger Launch Decision' by Diane Vaughan [0]. It looks at the organizational structure that led to the Challenger disaster. If you're interested in learning more about the background to the launch, and the lessons for any complex…
“但挑战者号爆炸并不是因为‘搞笑衬衫星期五’，而是因为管理层不尊重工程师。”——这完全是个谣传。我建议你读读黛安·沃恩写的《挑战者号发射决策》。挑战者号爆炸并非因为管理层不尊重工程师，而是工程师自己把异常当成了常态（normalized deviance）。他们一次次发射，观察到了异常……
>But the Challenger didn't explode because of Silly Shirt Friday. It exploded because management didn't respect their engineers. That's a myth. I encourage you to read Challenger Launch Decision, by Diane Vaughan. Challenger didn't explode because management disrespected their engineers. Challenger exploded because the engineers themselves normalized deviance. They would launch, observe anomalous…
这篇文章参考了该领域由黛安·沃恩撰写的权威著作[0]。去读读她关于挑战者号发射决策的研究吧——它详尽剖析了为什么异常会被常态化。甚至细致到了关键决策电话会议是如何将技术意见边缘化的。https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Professionalism/Diane_Vaughan_...
The article draws on the definitive text in this area by Diane Vaughan[0]. Read her work on the Challenger Launch Decision - it goes into the details of why the deviance was normalised. Even down to the level of how important decision making conference calls marginalised technical inputs. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Professionalism/Diane_Vaughan_...