……考虑到亚马逊的规模之大，以及他们的第三方平台在欺诈消费者方面简直就是一场噩梦，我认为3000万美元的罚款根本不足以让他们改邪归正。关于这一点，我建议读读 Ralph Nader 的《Unsafe at Any Speed》。
…Given how large Amazon is, and how their marketplace is a nightmare of consumer fraud, I think $30 million is not enough of a penalty to make them clean up their act. For more on this, I suggest reading "Unsafe at Any Speed" by Ralph Nader.
在 Ralph Nader 成为绿党的代表人物以及2008年大选的黑马候选人之前，他曾是整个汽车行业的噩梦。去看看他的书《Unsafe at Any Speed》吧。通用汽车（GM）对上述内容作何回应？无非是耍小性子和懦弱逃避。当然，非得把他们押到国会、哭爹喊娘一阵之后，他们才肯采取实际行动。
Before Ralph Nader was the face of the Green Party and the the 2008 darkhorse candidate in the 2008 election, he was the bane of the automotive industry. Check out his book Unsafe at Any Speed. GM's response to the aforementioned? One of petulance and cowardice. They had to be hauled into Congress, kicking and screaming of course, before anything was done.
……关于监管意想不到的后果提了不少很好的观点，但在我看来，汽车哪怕没有 auto-pilot 也完全能正常开——而且从最初的 Model T 时代起就是如此。话虽如此，Ralph Nader 的《Unsafe At Any Speed》就是一个极佳的例子，说明为什么汽车行业需要监管。汽车挡风玻璃采用安全玻璃也是有原因的。我很想看到你把整篇帖子重写一遍，但只聚焦于自动驾驶……
…a bunch of good points about the unintended consequences of regulations, it's clear to me that cars work as is without an auto-pilot -- and have since the original Model T. That said, Ralph Nader's "Unsafe At Any Speed" is a great example of why regulation of automobiles is needed. There's also a reason why cars have safety glass on the windshield. I'd like to see your entire post again, but related only to self-driving…
……整个汽车行业的安全性？我觉得这种对比毫无意义，而且它忽视了汽车安全改进那段漫长而跌宕起伏的历史。如果你真想看看人们是如何审视“常规”事故并认定必须做出整改的，那就去翻翻 Ralph Nader 的《Unsafe At Any Speed》吧。
…the safety of the entire car industry? I don't think that comparison offers anything interesting, and it ignores the long and storied history of improving automobile safety. Look into Ralph Naders "Unsafe At Any Speed" if you really want to see people looking at "regular" accidents and deciding there was something to be fixed.
……考虑到亚马逊的规模之大，以及他们的第三方平台在欺诈消费者方面简直就是一场噩梦，我认为3000万美元的罚款根本不足以让他们改邪归正。关于这一点，我建议读读 Ralph Nader 的《Unsafe at Any Speed》。
…Given how large Amazon is, and how their marketplace is a nightmare of consumer fraud, I think $30 million is not enough of a penalty to make them clean up their act. For more on this, I suggest reading "Unsafe at Any Speed" by Ralph Nader.
在 Ralph Nader 成为绿党的代表人物以及2008年大选的黑马候选人之前，他曾是整个汽车行业的噩梦。去看看他的书《Unsafe at Any Speed》吧。通用汽车（GM）对上述内容作何回应？无非是耍小性子和懦弱逃避。当然，非得把他们押到国会、哭爹喊娘一阵之后，他们才肯采取实际行动。
Before Ralph Nader was the face of the Green Party and the the 2008 darkhorse candidate in the 2008 election, he was the bane of the automotive industry. Check out his book Unsafe at Any Speed. GM's response to the aforementioned? One of petulance and cowardice. They had to be hauled into Congress, kicking and screaming of course, before anything was done.
……关于监管意想不到的后果提了不少很好的观点，但在我看来，汽车哪怕没有 auto-pilot 也完全能正常开——而且从最初的 Model T 时代起就是如此。话虽如此，Ralph Nader 的《Unsafe At Any Speed》就是一个极佳的例子，说明为什么汽车行业需要监管。汽车挡风玻璃采用安全玻璃也是有原因的。我很想看到你把整篇帖子重写一遍，但只聚焦于自动驾驶……
…a bunch of good points about the unintended consequences of regulations, it's clear to me that cars work as is without an auto-pilot -- and have since the original Model T. That said, Ralph Nader's "Unsafe At Any Speed" is a great example of why regulation of automobiles is needed. There's also a reason why cars have safety glass on the windshield. I'd like to see your entire post again, but related only to self-driving…
多亏了 Ralph Nader，汽车才变得安全得多。去 Google 搜搜“unsafe at any speed”吧。
Vehicles became a lot safer because of Ralph Nader. Google “unsafe at any speed”.
另见：Ralph Nader 的《Unsafe at Any Speed》
See also: "Unsafe at Any Speed" by Ralph Nader
……整个汽车行业的安全性？我觉得这种对比毫无意义，而且它忽视了汽车安全改进那段漫长而跌宕起伏的历史。如果你真想看看人们是如何审视“常规”事故并认定必须做出整改的，那就去翻翻 Ralph Nader 的《Unsafe At Any Speed》吧。
…the safety of the entire car industry? I don't think that comparison offers anything interesting, and it ignores the long and storied history of improving automobile safety. Look into Ralph Naders "Unsafe At Any Speed" if you really want to see people looking at "regular" accidents and deciding there was something to be fixed.