这里正好适合推荐 T. A. Heppenheimer 写的《History of the Space Shuttle, Volume Two: Development of the Space Shuttle, 1972-1981》。这本书对一个国家级工程项目，以及其背后数不胜数的工程、经济、基础设施和政治……进行了极佳的记述。
This is the perfect place to recommend "History of the Space Shuttle, Volume Two: Development of the Space Shuttle, 1972-1981" by T. A. Heppenheimer. An excellent account of a nation-scale engineering project and all the myriad engineering, economic, infrastructure, political,…
……确实很能说明当年研发航天飞机时工程分析的质量之高。供参考，你可以沉迷死磕以下几本神作：《Space Shuttle Decision, 1965-1972 (History of the Space Shuttle, Volume 1)》《Development of the Space Shuttle, 1972-1981 (History of the Space Shuttle, Volume 2)》
…really says something about the quality of engineering analysis which went into creating the Shuttle. For reference you can nerd out on the following awsome books: "Space Shuttle Decision, 1965-1972 (History of the Space Shuttle, Volume 1)" "Development of the Space Shuttle, 1972-1981 (History of the Space Shuttle, Volume 2)"
……好的（科研）和坏的（明目张胆地浪费资金）方式）；他们承受不起风险。除非你指的是“因为政治绑架了工程流程而带来的风险”，这种风险他们倒还真搞得出来。（读读航天飞机不加粉饰的真实历史真的很让人大开眼界。费曼和那杯冰水不过是抓人眼球的冰山一角。去 Google 搜搜“Senate Launch System”了解最新动态吧。）这种冒险精神已经不在他们的基因里了。你可以试图把它找回来，但是……
…(research) and bad (blatant waste of funds) ways); they can not do risky. Unless you mean "risky because politics compromised the engineering process", which they can also still do. (Reading an honest history of the Space Shuttle is an eyeopener. Feynman and the glass of ice water was only the flashy tip of the iceberg. Google "Senate Launch System" for the latest.) It isn't in their genes anymore. You could put it back, but in…
这里正好适合推荐 T. A. Heppenheimer 写的《History of the Space Shuttle, Volume Two: Development of the Space Shuttle, 1972-1981》。这本书对一个国家级工程项目，以及其背后数不胜数的工程、经济、基础设施和政治……进行了极佳的记述。
This is the perfect place to recommend "History of the Space Shuttle, Volume Two: Development of the Space Shuttle, 1972-1981" by T. A. Heppenheimer. An excellent account of a nation-scale engineering project and all the myriad engineering, economic, infrastructure, political,…
……确实很能说明当年研发航天飞机时工程分析的质量之高。供参考，你可以沉迷死磕以下几本神作：《Space Shuttle Decision, 1965-1972 (History of the Space Shuttle, Volume 1)》《Development of the Space Shuttle, 1972-1981 (History of the Space Shuttle, Volume 2)》
…really says something about the quality of engineering analysis which went into creating the Shuttle. For reference you can nerd out on the following awsome books: "Space Shuttle Decision, 1965-1972 (History of the Space Shuttle, Volume 1)" "Development of the Space Shuttle, 1972-1981 (History of the Space Shuttle, Volume 2)"
……好的（科研）和坏的（明目张胆地浪费资金）方式）；他们承受不起风险。除非你指的是“因为政治绑架了工程流程而带来的风险”，这种风险他们倒还真搞得出来。（读读航天飞机不加粉饰的真实历史真的很让人大开眼界。费曼和那杯冰水不过是抓人眼球的冰山一角。去 Google 搜搜“Senate Launch System”了解最新动态吧。）这种冒险精神已经不在他们的基因里了。你可以试图把它找回来，但是……
…(research) and bad (blatant waste of funds) ways); they can not do risky. Unless you mean "risky because politics compromised the engineering process", which they can also still do. (Reading an honest history of the Space Shuttle is an eyeopener. Feynman and the glass of ice water was only the flashy tip of the iceberg. Google "Senate Launch System" for the latest.) It isn't in their genes anymore. You could put it back, but in…