只要话题绕着哲学家乔治·桑塔亚那那句“遗忘历史的人注定重蹈覆辙”转，源泉就永远枯竭不了。
抛开“话题越不切实际”这种时间范围的依赖不谈：
如今都有了带 Google Glass 的 GPT-3，《战胜逻辑谬误：培养推理能力的28个知识锦囊（批判性思维与逻辑精通）》这本书可能显得不切实
Well never seems to dry up when topic(s) revolve around philosopher George Santayana's “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
Dropping the "more impractical the topic" time frame dependency:
Now that there's GPT3 with google glasses, "Conquer Logical Fallacies: 28 Nuggets Of Knowledge To Nurture Your Reasoning Skills (Critical Thinking & Logic Mastery)" might seem impra
你可能也会想看看 Hal Prince 写的《哥德尔原著导读》（The Annotated Godel），我在另一条评论里提到过。我们确实应该阅读经典原著，但也得保持智识上的诚实，承认其中有些（甚至大部分）内容我们可能根本看不懂（这取决于个人的背景）……
You might also want to look at The Annotated Godel by Hal Prince which i mention in another comment. We should read the original great works but with intellectual honesty to accept that some/most of it might be over our heads (depending on one's background)…
相关推荐：Hal Prince 写的《哥德尔原著导读：图解逻辑与不完备性经典论文》（The Annotated Godel: A Reader's Guide to his Classic Paper on Logic and Incompleteness）。这里有一篇不错的书评 - https://eevans.co/blog/annotated-godel-review/
Relevant: The Annotated Godel: A Reader's Guide to his Classic Paper on Logic and Incompleteness by Hal Prince. A good review - https://eevans.co/blog/annotated-godel-review/
……系统？他是怎么想到这个切入点的？在我看来，理解这类问题的答案，是紧跟他的论证思路前最重要的事情。我最近才知道 Hal Prince 写的《哥德尔原著导读：图解逻辑与不完备性经典论文》（The Annotated Godel: A Reader's Guide to his Classic Paper on Logic and Incompleteness），我觉得我得静下心来好好啃啃了 :-)
…system? How did he hit upon his approach? Answers to these sort of questions is what seems to me the most important thing to understand before following his arguments. I recently came to know of The Annotated Godel: A Reader's Guide to his Classic Paper on Logic and Incompleteness by Hal Prince which i think i need to sit with :-)
只要话题绕着哲学家乔治·桑塔亚那那句“遗忘历史的人注定重蹈覆辙”转，源泉就永远枯竭不了。 抛开“话题越不切实际”这种时间范围的依赖不谈： 如今都有了带 Google Glass 的 GPT-3，《战胜逻辑谬误：培养推理能力的28个知识锦囊（批判性思维与逻辑精通）》这本书可能显得不切实
Well never seems to dry up when topic(s) revolve around philosopher George Santayana's “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Dropping the "more impractical the topic" time frame dependency: Now that there's GPT3 with google glasses, "Conquer Logical Fallacies: 28 Nuggets Of Knowledge To Nurture Your Reasoning Skills (Critical Thinking & Logic Mastery)" might seem impra
你可能也会想看看 Hal Prince 写的《哥德尔原著导读》（The Annotated Godel），我在另一条评论里提到过。我们确实应该阅读经典原著，但也得保持智识上的诚实，承认其中有些（甚至大部分）内容我们可能根本看不懂（这取决于个人的背景）……
You might also want to look at The Annotated Godel by Hal Prince which i mention in another comment. We should read the original great works but with intellectual honesty to accept that some/most of it might be over our heads (depending on one's background)…
相关推荐：Hal Prince 写的《哥德尔原著导读：图解逻辑与不完备性经典论文》（The Annotated Godel: A Reader's Guide to his Classic Paper on Logic and Incompleteness）。这里有一篇不错的书评 - https://eevans.co/blog/annotated-godel-review/
Relevant: The Annotated Godel: A Reader's Guide to his Classic Paper on Logic and Incompleteness by Hal Prince. A good review - https://eevans.co/blog/annotated-godel-review/
……系统？他是怎么想到这个切入点的？在我看来，理解这类问题的答案，是紧跟他的论证思路前最重要的事情。我最近才知道 Hal Prince 写的《哥德尔原著导读：图解逻辑与不完备性经典论文》（The Annotated Godel: A Reader's Guide to his Classic Paper on Logic and Incompleteness），我觉得我得静下心来好好啃啃了 :-)
…system? How did he hit upon his approach? Answers to these sort of questions is what seems to me the most important thing to understand before following his arguments. I recently came to know of The Annotated Godel: A Reader's Guide to his Classic Paper on Logic and Incompleteness by Hal Prince which i think i need to sit with :-)