欢愉的工具
Tools for Conviviality
Ivan Illich · 初版 1973 年
13人推荐
32位读者提及
45次提及
为什么值得读
- 长篇分析以汽车为中心的城市为何效率极低
- 探讨人与技术互动及如何合理介入制度
- 观点深刻且比作者其他作品表达相对温和
Tools for Conviviality 是 Ivan Illich 于1973年出版的一本关于技术合理使用的著作。该书在其上一部作品 Deschooling Society 面世仅两年后出版。在这部新作中，Illich 将他此前应用于教育领域的主题进行了推广：专业知识的制度化、技术官僚精英在工业社会中的主导地位，以及普通公民重新夺回实用知识所需开发的新工具。他写道，“精英专业群体……已经对诸如基本人
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……里面确实有一些非常精彩的段落，但也孕育了反疫苗和自然疗法运动的萌芽。他的批判很有力，但答案绝非去体制化（deinstitutionalism）。真正的答案是在与体制打交道或依托体制时，切实践行他在《Tools for Conviviality》里提出的理念。如果没有 conviviality（适度技术/交融共生），Learning Webs 就会沦为又一个“平台”，任由吸血的硅谷中间商从所有的教育开支中狠抽 20%……
…has some great passages but in it is also the germs of the anti-vaccination and natural healing movements. His critiques are powerful but the answer is not deinstitutionalism. The answer is taking his Tools for Conviviality to heart when engaging with/through institutions. Without conviviality, Learning Webs will become a "Platform" with blood-sucking silicon valley middle men taking a 20% cut on all education spending…
……这不单单是因为地理环境，更是因为当年的城市规划/建筑设计。二战后的美国城市完完全全是为汽车量身打造的，这在生态和实用层面上都是一场灾难。另见 Ivan Illich 的《Tools for Conviviality》，书里有一大段长篇分析，讲为什么以汽车为中心的城市效率低得惨不忍睹。
…not just due to geography but to actual urban planning/architecture. Post-WWII US cities were explicitly designed for cars, and that's a disaster ecologically and practically. See also Ivan Illich's Tools for Conviviality which has a long analysis on why car-oriented cities has a terribly-low efficiency.
* Ivan Illich 的《Tools for Conviviality》* J.A. Baker 的《The Peregrine》
* Tools for Conviviality, by Ivan Illich * The Peregrine, by J.A. Baker
几本关于人类如何与技术相互作用（反之亦然）、既有影响力又发人深省的书：* Jacques Ellul 的《The Technological Society》* Ivan Illich 的《Tools for Conviviality》* Matthew Crawford 的《Shop Class as Soulcraft》
Some influential and interesting books on how humanity interacts with technology (and vice-versa): * The Technological Society, Jacques Ellul * Tools for Conviviality, Ivan Illich * Shop Class as Soulcraft, Matthew Crawford
如果你对这个论点很感兴趣，但又想看一位言辞没那么激进煽动的作者，不妨看看 Ivan Illich 的《Tools For Conviviality》。
If you are intrigued in the argument but would like a less inflammatory author, check out “Tools For Conviviality” by Ivan Illich.
你们可以去读读 Ivan Illich 在 1973 年写的《Tools for Conviviality》[1]。他讨论了工具应该如何做到更有克制、真正为人所用，而不是让人沦为工具的奴隶（这个观点他反复强调过很多次）。它进一步拓展了之前的想法……
You guys could read "Tools for Conviviality"[1] by Ivan Illich (1973). He talks about how tools could be more limited and useful to the person rather than make a person slave of the tool (he repeats this idea a lot). It expands on a previous idea…