智识的赝品

Hacker News 上怎么说

• zwischenzug · 2013 年

  任何对文理之争感兴趣的人，都应该读读这本神书以及那篇绝赞的文章：http://www.amazon.co.uk/Intellectual-Impostures-Jean-Bricmon... 我在研究生阶段学过历史、艺术史和计算机科学，不得不说我 100% 赞同这位工程师的说法：“对各种……的实际分析质量

  Anyone interested in the arts vs sciences debate should read this fantastic book as well as that fantastic article: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Intellectual-Impostures-Jean-Bricmon... I've studied history, art history and computing science at graduate level, and have to say I agree 100% with this engineer's statement: "The quality of the actual analysis of various…

• vixen99 · 2019 年

  要是有人想多了解一下这帮理论家，不妨去读读偏左翼的物理学家 Alan Sokal 写的《知识的骗局》。

  And anyone who wants to know a bit more about some of these theorists might want to read 'Intellectual Impostures' by the Left-leaning physicist Alan Sokal.

• zwischenzug · 2016 年

  ……我是个软件工程师。以前也痴迷过一阵后现代研究。我不太清楚《Social Text》霸凌那档子事（我之前从没听说过《Social Text》，所以当时没觉得在那上面发表有多大不了），但 Sokal 在《知识的骗局》里对这帮作者滥用科学概念的剖析，可以说极其公允且敏锐。他非常克制，绝不对他们哲学写作中非科学内容的部分妄加评论，而且……

  …software engineer here. Was once into PoMo studies. I don't know about the Social Text bullying issue (I'd never heard of Social Text, so I didn't think its publication that significant), but Sokal's Intellectual Impostures picks apart most of those writers' abuse of scientific concepts extremely fairly and sensitively. He takes great care not to comment on their philosophical writing outside of its scientific content, and…

• pervycreeper · 2014 年

  ……这种批评肯定是相互的，哲学界乃至整个人文社科界许多（甚至绝大多数？）人对科学到底是什么、已经做到了什么所持的理解，简直让人极度抑郁（参见 Sokal 和 Bricmont 的《知识的骗局》）。我个人的观察是，人文学者对科学家抱有极大的怨恨、嫉妒和被压抑的自卑情结。

  …criticism certainly goes both ways, with the understanding of many (most?) in philosophy and the humanities in general of what science actually is and has done is deeply depressing (see Soakl and Bricmont's "Intellectual Impostures"). My personal observation is that there is a lot of resentment, envy, and repressed inferiority complexes that humanist academics hold towards scientists.

• a77jk153 · 2016 年

  艾伦·索卡尔（Alan Sokal）的《Beyond The Hoax》和《Intellectual Impostures》都是探讨这个话题的好书。

  Alan Sokal's 'Beyond The Hoax' and 'Intellectual Impostures' are good reads about the subject.

• codeulike · 2017 年

  在这之后不久，Sokal 和 Bricmont 合写了一本书叫《时髦的胡说》（在英国出版时名为《知识的骗局》），书里正面硬刚了拉康、德勒兹和加塔利等人。非常值得一读。摘自维基百科对该书的词条：Sokal 和 Bricmont 声称他们并不打算去分析后现代主义……

  Soon after this Sokal and Bricmont wrote a book called 'Fashionable Nonsense' (titled Intellectual Impostures in the UK) in which they tackle Lacan, Deleuze and Guatarri, etc. Its well worth a read. From the wiki page about the book: Sokal and Bricmont claim that they do not intend to analyze postmodernist…

正在加载完整评论……