自由选择
Free to choose
Milton Friedman、Rose D. Friedman · 初版 1980 年
21人推荐
41位读者提及
45次提及
为什么值得读
- 行文生动有趣，普通大众也能轻松读懂
- 由实际信奉者全面展现自由市场核心观点
- 立足人性现实来探讨合理的社会机制
在这部兼具力量与说服力的著作中，著名经济学家 Milton Friedman 携其妻子 Rose 为普通大众（无论身处 Wall Street 还是 Main Street）揭开了经济学的神秘面纱。他们向我们展示了华盛顿法律、法规、行政机构及财政支出的激增如何侵蚀我们的自由并破坏繁荣；揭示了当政府充当中间人时，良好的意图往往如何导致令人扼腕的恶果。随后，他们指出如果我们希望扩大自由、促进繁荣应该怎么做。如果你曾疑惑为何自己在为别人老去...
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
黑兹利特的《一课经济学》：http://jim.com/econ/，http://www.fee.org/pdf/books/Economics_in_one_lesson.pdf；托马斯·索维尔的《基础经济学》；托马斯·索维尔的《应用经济学》；米尔顿·弗里德曼的《自由选择》（也有视频系列）；哈耶克的《知识在社会中的利用》（简短非技术性论文，充满真知灼见）：http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/hykKnw1.html。不是一本……
Economics in One Lesson by Hazlitt: http://jim.com/econ/, http://www.fee.org/pdf/books/Economics_in_one_lesson.pdf Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell Applied Economics by Thomas Sowell Free to Choose by Milton Friedman (video series, too) Use of Knowledge in Society by Hayek (short, non-technical paper which is full of brilliant insights): http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/hykKnw1.html Not a…
……需求。哦，当然还有天下没有免费的午餐。秉承这种精神，以下是几本我极其认真地认为每个人都应该被强制阅读的经济学书籍。黑兹利特的《一课经济学》，米尔顿和罗斯·弗里德曼的《自由选择：个人声明》，列维特和都伯纳的《魔鬼经济学》（这书读起来简直太他妈有趣了），对于黑客们：帕特森的《机器之神》（想想工程学……
…demand. Oh, and of course No Free Lunch. So in that spirit, here are a couple of economics books that I quite seriously believe everyone should be forced to read. Economics in One Lesson, by Hazlitt Free to Choose: A Personal Statement, by Milton and Rose Friedman Freakonomics, by Levitt and Dubner (this book is just so damn fun to read) and for the hackers: The God of the Machine, by Paterson (Think engineering…
我很高兴你终于在和一个真正的自由意志主义者交流了。很多自称是的人其实根本没深入思考过也没读过多少相关内容。如果你想读一本由另一位真正的自由意志主义者写的书，米尔顿·弗里德曼的《自由选择》是个不错的起点。自由意志主义巧妙的地方在于，它不需要完美就能运转。既然人类社会的方方面面都不可能完美，那这就是个绝佳的特性。……
I'm glad you're finally talking to an actual one. Many people call themselves one who haven't actually thought much or read much about it. If you want a book written by another actual libertarian, "Free to Choose" by Milton Friedman is a good start. The neato thing about libertarianism is it doesn't have to be perfect in order to work. Since nothing about human societies can be perfect, this is fine feature.…
……得出了与罗尔斯不同的结论。两本书都很棒，普通读者完全读得懂（也就是说不需要哲学学位）。然而它们很严肃，不像弗里德曼夫妇的《自由选择》那么有意思。这两本哲学书从哲学角度探讨了公平社会应该是什么样的，但我感觉它们没有触及人性中那些被证明很棘手的层面……
…different conclusion than Rawls. Both books are good and completely accessible to an ordinary reader (i.e. philosophy degree not required). However, they are serious and not as entertaining as the Friedmans' Free to Choose. While the two philosophy books address the question of what should a fair society look like from a philosophical perspective, I feel they don't address the aspects of human nature that have proven troublesome…
我建议读完《休克主义》（The Shock Doctrine）后再读读弗里德曼的《自由选择》 http://www.amazon.com/Free-Choose-Statement-Milton-Friedman/... （弗里德曼就是内奥米·克莱因在书里甩锅的那个人）
I recommend reading Friedman's Free to Choose after reading The Shock Doctrine http://www.amazon.com/Free-Choose-Statement-Milton-Friedman/... (Friedman is the guy that Naomi Klein blames on the book)
我发现米尔顿·弗里德曼的《自由选择》既基础又非常好读。https://www.amazon.com/Free-Choose-Statement-Milton-Friedman...
I found Milton Friedman's "Free To Choose" fundamental and very readable. https://www.amazon.com/Free-Choose-Statement-Milton-Friedman...