…this "crisis of abundance" is not exactly a new question. Even moving to agrarian living had growing pains. The best example philosophically detailing this, I think, is the work by Thomas Paine called Agrarian Justice. (that's the same Paine as Common Sense, Rights of Man, and Age of Reason) Agrarian Justice is a short pamphlet that I think everyone should read. It details in simple terms how civilized society is…
…actually seeded with some really interesting arguments and analysis. Still focusing on land, but bringing things back towards Norvig's simulation (lots of individual actors), Thomas Paine's short essay, "Agrarian Justice," has some good descriptions of what goes on and offers some pretty good solutions. http://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html
At least one prominent American, Thomas Paine (of the American revolution) advocated a guaranteed minimum income for everyone in his pamphlet Agrarian Justice, which was a real fascinating read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrarian_Justice The US Social Security administration keeps a full text of the pamphlet online: http://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html
…of an issue like basic income where heroes of the right and of the left disagree adamantly amongst themselves. If Friedman isn't "right" enough for you, how's Thomas Paine? See his pamphlet entitled "Agrarian Justice". Point is: there is no correct "right" or "left" or "capitalist" or "socialist" position on this issue. Opposing it simply because it constitutes a wealth transfer ignores that fact that every society…
Thomas Paine 在他的小册子《土地正义》（Agrarian Justice）中为公民红利提出了很好的论点。http://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html 既然我们生活在文明国家，人们拥有所有财产，这就使得一个人不可能生活在自然状态中。所以，他主张财产所有者……
Thomas Paine makes a good point for citizen's dividend in his pamphlet "Agrarian Justice". http://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html Now that we live in a civilized state and people own all the property, it makes it impossible for one to live in a natural state. So, he argues property owners…
你可以在没有所得税或营业税的情况下实行基本收入。Thomas Paine 的《土地正义》（Agrarian Justice）就提出了这样一个制度。https://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html
You can have basic income without income or business tax. Thomas Paine's Agrarian Justice proposed just such a system. https://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html
……这种“丰裕带来的危机”其实根本不是什么新问题。哪怕是当年转向农耕生活，也是经历过阵痛期的。我觉得从哲学层面把这事阐述得最透彻的例子，就是托马斯·潘恩写的《土地正义》（Agrarian Justice）。（没错，就是写《常识》《人的权利》和《理性时代》的那个潘恩）。《土地正义》是一本很薄的小册子，我觉得人人都该读读。它用极平实的语言讲明白了文明社会是如何……
…this "crisis of abundance" is not exactly a new question. Even moving to agrarian living had growing pains. The best example philosophically detailing this, I think, is the work by Thomas Paine called Agrarian Justice. (that's the same Paine as Common Sense, Rights of Man, and Age of Reason) Agrarian Justice is a short pamphlet that I think everyone should read. It details in simple terms how civilized society is…
……其实里面穿插了不少非常有意思的论点和分析。如果同样把焦点放在土地上，但把视角拉回到诺维格（Norvig）的那套模拟仿真（存在大量个体行为主体）上，托马斯·潘恩的短文《土地正义》（Agrarian Justice）对实际情况做出了非常到位的描绘，并给出了一些相当不错的解决方案。http://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html
…actually seeded with some really interesting arguments and analysis. Still focusing on land, but bringing things back towards Norvig's simulation (lots of individual actors), Thomas Paine's short essay, "Agrarian Justice," has some good descriptions of what goes on and offers some pretty good solutions. http://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html
至少有一位大名鼎鼎的美国人——（美国独立战争时期的）托马斯·潘恩——在他那本读起来极其过瘾的小册子《土地正义》（Agrarian Justice）里，就主张过给所有人发放有保障的最低收入：http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrarian_Justice。美国社会保障局官网上有这本小册子的全文收录：http://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html
At least one prominent American, Thomas Paine (of the American revolution) advocated a guaranteed minimum income for everyone in his pamphlet Agrarian Justice, which was a real fascinating read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrarian_Justice The US Social Security administration keeps a full text of the pamphlet online: http://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html
……在基本收入这类议题上，左派和右派各自阵营里的领军人物内部都吵得不可开交。如果你觉得弗里德曼还不够“右”，那托马斯·潘恩如何？去看看他那本题为《土地正义》（Agrarian Justice）的小册子吧。核心在于：在这个问题上，根本就不存在什么唯一正确的“左”、“右”、“资本主义”或“社会主义”立场。仅仅因为它构成了财富转移就反对它，完全是无视了每个社会都……
…of an issue like basic income where heroes of the right and of the left disagree adamantly amongst themselves. If Friedman isn't "right" enough for you, how's Thomas Paine? See his pamphlet entitled "Agrarian Justice". Point is: there is no correct "right" or "left" or "capitalist" or "socialist" position on this issue. Opposing it simply because it constitutes a wealth transfer ignores that fact that every society…
Thomas Paine 在他的小册子《土地正义》（Agrarian Justice）中为公民红利提出了很好的论点。http://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html 既然我们生活在文明国家，人们拥有所有财产，这就使得一个人不可能生活在自然状态中。所以，他主张财产所有者……
Thomas Paine makes a good point for citizen's dividend in his pamphlet "Agrarian Justice". http://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html Now that we live in a civilized state and people own all the property, it makes it impossible for one to live in a natural state. So, he argues property owners…
你可以在没有所得税或营业税的情况下实行基本收入。Thomas Paine 的《土地正义》（Agrarian Justice）就提出了这样一个制度。https://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html
You can have basic income without income or business tax. Thomas Paine's Agrarian Justice proposed just such a system. https://www.ssa.gov/history/paine4.html