Erik Kwakkel 太棒了。想了解更多关于脚注的历史，可以看看 Anthony Grafton 的《The Footnote: A Curious History》（http://www.amazon.com/The-Footnote-A-Curious-History/dp/0674...）还有 Chuck Zerby 的书《The Devil's in the Details》也不错。
Erik Kwakkel is awesome. For more on the history of footnotes, check out Anthony Grafton's The Footnote: A Curious History (http://www.amazon.com/The-Footnote-A-Curious-History/dp/0674...) There's also Chuck Zerby's book, The Devil's in the Details.
在 Anthony Grafton 的《The Footnote: A Curious History》中，他指出历史学界的引文习惯往往喜欢用“cf.”——这本来通常指“参考对照此条目”——来表达“与……进行对比
In Anthony Grafton's The Footnote: A Curious History, he claims that citations practices in the field of history have the tendency to use "cf." -- which normally means something like "compare with this reference" -- to mean "compare with…
Erik Kwakkel 太棒了。想了解更多关于脚注的历史，可以看看 Anthony Grafton 的《The Footnote: A Curious History》（http://www.amazon.com/The-Footnote-A-Curious-History/dp/0674...）还有 Chuck Zerby 的书《The Devil's in the Details》也不错。
Erik Kwakkel is awesome. For more on the history of footnotes, check out Anthony Grafton's The Footnote: A Curious History (http://www.amazon.com/The-Footnote-A-Curious-History/dp/0674...) There's also Chuck Zerby's book, The Devil's in the Details.
在 Anthony Grafton 的《The Footnote: A Curious History》中，他指出历史学界的引文习惯往往喜欢用“cf.”——这本来通常指“参考对照此条目”——来表达“与……进行对比
In Anthony Grafton's The Footnote: A Curious History, he claims that citations practices in the field of history have the tendency to use "cf." -- which normally means something like "compare with this reference" -- to mean "compare with…