《面向现代学生的古典修辞学》封面

面向现代学生的古典修辞学

Classical rhetoric for the modern student

Edward P. J. Corbett · 初版 1965 年

2人推荐
4位读者提及
5次提及

作为高等写作课程中同类教材中使用最广的一部,Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student 探讨了古典修辞学的三个核心要素——论证、布局与文风——赋予这些要素生机,并展示它们在过去与当今写作中的有效应用。全书分五大部分展开,为古典修辞学的要素与应用、论证的策略与战术、语篇的有效呈现与组织,以及力量与优……

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • ……但这门学科的本质就是如此。关于修辞学,古典资源浩如烟海,从亚里士多德到西塞罗等等,不胜枚举。现代资源里有一本极佳的读物是爱德华·P·J·科贝特(Edward P.J. Corbett)的《面向现代学生的古典修辞学》(Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student,牛津大学出版社 1965 年版)(后来有编辑为了让它更契合 1970 年代的‘时代语境’做过改版,结果质量大打折扣——如果可能的话,尽量在 Abebooks 上买早期版本)。

    …but this is the nature of the subject. Concerning rhetoric, classical resources are vast, ranging from works by Aristotle to Cicero to many others. An excellent modern resource is Edward P.J. Corbett, Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student (Oxford University Press 1965) (this work was updated later by editors who sought to make it "relevant" for the 1970s, and much diminished as a result - get the earlier edition through Abebooks if possible).

  • 《面向现代学生的古典修辞学》(Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student)这本书对于提升写作水平来说是不可多得的宝藏。内容硬核、严谨细致,对我而言价值连城。我认为它就是文学界的‘技术操作手册’。读起来相当费脑,绝不是那种能随随便便翻完的书。[0]……

    The book "Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student" is a great resource to improve your authorship. It's dense, meticulous, and for me, invaluable. I consider it the literary equivalent of a technical manual. It's quite dense, not a passive read. [0]…

  • 我也非常喜欢《面向现代学生的古典修辞学》(Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student)。剖析得非常深刻,是一本写得很棒的教科书,专门面向高年级文学课程。

    I really enjoyed “Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student” also. A very in depth look, it’s a well-written textbook intended for later-year literature courses.

  • * 《实用数学》 * 《面向现代学生的古典修辞学》 * 《算术基础》 * 《爱默生随笔集》

    * Practical Mathematics * Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student * Foundations of Arithmetic * Emerson's Essays

  • ……理性。关于这个主题的大多数实验,结果基本都变成了‘然后他们就顺从了直觉,看谁更顺眼就选谁’。另外,我记得好像也是在《面向现代学生的古典修辞学》(Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student)里提到过:逻辑论证其实是修辞说服力最弱的一种形式,因为几乎任何其他手段都比它更容易说服别人。

    …rationality. It's like the vast majority of experiments on the subject ends up with "and then they proceeded to use their intuition and who they like more to make their decision". Also, I think it was "Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student" that also said that logical arguments are the weakest kind of rhetorical arguments since basically anything else is more likely to convince people.

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助