…正义、刚毅、谨慎和节制就是这类例子的代表。关于自然法理论的论证，我推荐以下几篇偏亚里士多德/托马斯主义倾向的哲学家的作品：[书籍] Edward Feser 写的《Aquinas》。第 5 章讲伦理学。[文章] David Oderberg 写的《The Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Law》：https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7SKlRTfkUiebnUxMUEtc1B4VTQ/...
…justice, fortitude, prudence, and temperance are examples of things that do. I recommend the following for arguments for natural law theory, by philosphers of an Aristotelian/Thomistic bent: [Book] Aquinas, by Edward Feser. Chapter 5 is on Ethics. [Article] The Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Law, by David Oderberg: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7SKlRTfkUiebnUxMUEtc1B4VTQ/...
……帖子深入相关主题，澄清了这些要点。我也推荐 Feser 关于相关主题的书，以文笔清晰、解释明白著称。好的起点是《Aquinas: A Beginner's Guide》，然后是《Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction》。Aquinas 绝对是亚里士多德派，而经院哲学家们广义上说深受亚里士多德影响。
…posts delve into related subjects that clarify these points. I also recommend Feser's books on related subjects which are known for their lucid prose and clear explanations. Good places to start are "Aquinas: A Beginner's Guide" and then "Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction". Aquinas was decidedly Aristotelian and the scholastic philosophers broadly speaking were heavily influenced by Aristotle.
Aristotle and Aquinas are indispensible (though you might want to begin with commentaries or approachable introductions, like Feser's). Contrary to the liberal tradition, "freedom" is understood as self-mastery not uninhibited…
…这些质疑都是可以回应的，如果我要么有钱要么没孩子，我就自己写了。可惜我既不富裕也有娃，所以我能做的就是给你推荐几本书：看看 Edward Feser 的书，尤其是《Aquinas》和《Five Proofs》。如果你想看有人用道金斯（Dawkins）自己的语调把他怼回去，看《The Last Superstition》。为了解答你的疑问，你目前为止做了哪些研究？
…objections can be answered, and if I were either rich or childless I would do so myself. But I'm neither, so all I can do is provide you with a book recommendation: check out Edward Feser's work, especially Aquinas and Five Proofs. If you want to see Dawkins refuted in his own tone, see The Last Superstition. What research have you done up to this point to answer your questions?
生机论（Vitalism）在阿奎那或亚里士多德的思想里完全找不到任何影子。想看对他们观点的入门级通俗讨论，可以看看 Edward Feser 的《Aquinas》。
Vitalism is utterly foreign to anything found in Aquinas or Aristotle. Check out Edward Feser's Aquinas for a beginner-friendly discussion of what they say.
The word 'soul' is used by Aquinas and Aristotle in a very different way from how modern people (from Descartes onward) use it, and this is the cause of an enormous amount of confusion. Edward Feser's book Aquinas is a good starting point…
…正义、刚毅、谨慎和节制就是这类例子的代表。关于自然法理论的论证，我推荐以下几篇偏亚里士多德/托马斯主义倾向的哲学家的作品：[书籍] Edward Feser 写的《Aquinas》。第 5 章讲伦理学。[文章] David Oderberg 写的《The Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Law》：https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7SKlRTfkUiebnUxMUEtc1B4VTQ/...
…justice, fortitude, prudence, and temperance are examples of things that do. I recommend the following for arguments for natural law theory, by philosphers of an Aristotelian/Thomistic bent: [Book] Aquinas, by Edward Feser. Chapter 5 is on Ethics. [Article] The Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Law, by David Oderberg: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7SKlRTfkUiebnUxMUEtc1B4VTQ/...
……帖子深入相关主题，澄清了这些要点。我也推荐 Feser 关于相关主题的书，以文笔清晰、解释明白著称。好的起点是《Aquinas: A Beginner's Guide》，然后是《Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction》。Aquinas 绝对是亚里士多德派，而经院哲学家们广义上说深受亚里士多德影响。
…posts delve into related subjects that clarify these points. I also recommend Feser's books on related subjects which are known for their lucid prose and clear explanations. Good places to start are "Aquinas: A Beginner's Guide" and then "Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction". Aquinas was decidedly Aristotelian and the scholastic philosophers broadly speaking were heavily influenced by Aristotle.
亚里士多德和阿奎那是必读的（不过你可能想先从注疏或通俗易懂的入门书读起，比如 Feser 的书）。与自由主义传统相反，这里的“自由”被理解为自我克制/自律，而不是无拘无束…
Aristotle and Aquinas are indispensible (though you might want to begin with commentaries or approachable introductions, like Feser's). Contrary to the liberal tradition, "freedom" is understood as self-mastery not uninhibited…
…这些质疑都是可以回应的，如果我要么有钱要么没孩子，我就自己写了。可惜我既不富裕也有娃，所以我能做的就是给你推荐几本书：看看 Edward Feser 的书，尤其是《Aquinas》和《Five Proofs》。如果你想看有人用道金斯（Dawkins）自己的语调把他怼回去，看《The Last Superstition》。为了解答你的疑问，你目前为止做了哪些研究？
…objections can be answered, and if I were either rich or childless I would do so myself. But I'm neither, so all I can do is provide you with a book recommendation: check out Edward Feser's work, especially Aquinas and Five Proofs. If you want to see Dawkins refuted in his own tone, see The Last Superstition. What research have you done up to this point to answer your questions?
生机论（Vitalism）在阿奎那或亚里士多德的思想里完全找不到任何影子。想看对他们观点的入门级通俗讨论，可以看看 Edward Feser 的《Aquinas》。
Vitalism is utterly foreign to anything found in Aquinas or Aristotle. Check out Edward Feser's Aquinas for a beginner-friendly discussion of what they say.
Aquinas 和 Aristotle 使用“灵魂”一词的方式与现代人（从 Descartes 起）非常不同，这是大量混乱的根源。Edward Feser 的《Aquinas》是个好起点……
The word 'soul' is used by Aquinas and Aristotle in a very different way from how modern people (from Descartes onward) use it, and this is the cause of an enormous amount of confusion. Edward Feser's book Aquinas is a good starting point…