…来自另一个阵营的人对“纯”工程阵营给予了厚道的“强人论证”（strongman）。话虽如此，其实有一条客观路径能走出这个陷阱——破折号——去看看 Dave Farley 关于现代软件工程的著作 [1]。把软件交付过程本身转化成一个软件工程问题，并以每 24 小时安全发布一次新代码为底线标准，这是个非常聪明的思路。当你的“纯”工程师们…
…charitable "strongman" take of the "pure" engineering camp from someone who identifies with the other camp. That being said, there is an objective way out of this trap emdash check out Dave Farley's work on Modern Software Engineering [1]. It is a very clever approach to convert the process of software delivery into a software problem itself, with a minimal criteria of shipping new code safely every 24 hours. When your "pure" engineers…
…我们那些关键系统，而我们不敢这么干主要就是因为缺乏真正有技术能力的软件工程师。依我看，AI agent 正在帮我们腾出时间去钻研真正重要的东西。我会建议从 Dave Farley 的《现代软件工程》（Modern Software Engineering）读起。如果你想在这个话题上交流，可以直接私信我。https://www.linkedin.com/in/dvydra/
…our critical systems and we are afraid to do so primarily to the lack of truly skilled software engineers. IMHO, the AI agents are creating time for us to study what really matters. I would start with Modern Software Engineering by Dave Farley. DM me directly if you want to chat on this topic. https://www.linkedin.com/in/dvydra/
对于“软件工程”，我最认可的定义出自 David Farley《现代软件工程》的第一章：“软件工程是应用经验主义和科学的方法，为软件中的实际问题寻找高效且经济的解决方案。”至于从业者，他…
My preferred definition of software engineering is found in the first chapter of Modern Software Engineering by David Farley Software engineering is the application of an empirical, scientific approach to finding efficient, economic solutions to practical problems in software. As for the practitioner, he…
我目前正在读 David Farley 的《现代软件工程》，我敢说，除非这本书和其他书里指出的所有顾虑都被彻底解决，否则我们绝不会看到程序员被取代。
I'm currently reading Modern Software Engineering by David Farley and I can say that we won't see programmers replaced unless all the concerns pointed out in this book and others has been resolved.
我最近一直在读 Dave Farley 的新书《现代软件工程》。他在书里吐槽了几次 GitFlow 和 Trunk 开发模式的对比。他的很多观点与楼主一致，即代码合并是 GitFlow 的一大痛点。这两种策略我都在不同项目里用过。无论如何…
I’ve been reading Dave Farley’s new book, “Modern Software Engineering” He has a few rants related to GitFlow vs Trunk development. Many of his points agree with OP in that merging is a big pain point in GitFlow. I’ve both used strategies on many different projects. Regardless…
…实践做得很到位，以至于我最近在与几个团队共事时，总忍不住在想整个行业的其他人到底什么时候才能赶上来。我目前在读 Dave "Continuous Delivery" Farley 的《现代软件工程》，以及 Woody Zuill 关于 mob programming 的新书《Software Teaming》。我迫切希望别再陷入这种境地，但我又不太确定该怎么做。我极力避免碰 Microsoft Teams、Scaled…
…practices enough that I've ended up working with a couple teams recently where I kept wondering when the rest of the industry is going to catch up. I'm currently reading Dave "Continuous Delivery" Farley's "Modern Software Engineering", and Woody Zuill's new book about mob programming, "Software Teaming". I'm keen to not end up in this situation again but I'm not quite sure how to do that. I try hard to avoid Microsoft Teams, Scaled…
…来自另一个阵营的人对“纯”工程阵营给予了厚道的“强人论证”（strongman）。话虽如此，其实有一条客观路径能走出这个陷阱——破折号——去看看 Dave Farley 关于现代软件工程的著作 [1]。把软件交付过程本身转化成一个软件工程问题，并以每 24 小时安全发布一次新代码为底线标准，这是个非常聪明的思路。当你的“纯”工程师们…
…charitable "strongman" take of the "pure" engineering camp from someone who identifies with the other camp. That being said, there is an objective way out of this trap emdash check out Dave Farley's work on Modern Software Engineering [1]. It is a very clever approach to convert the process of software delivery into a software problem itself, with a minimal criteria of shipping new code safely every 24 hours. When your "pure" engineers…
…我们那些关键系统，而我们不敢这么干主要就是因为缺乏真正有技术能力的软件工程师。依我看，AI agent 正在帮我们腾出时间去钻研真正重要的东西。我会建议从 Dave Farley 的《现代软件工程》（Modern Software Engineering）读起。如果你想在这个话题上交流，可以直接私信我。https://www.linkedin.com/in/dvydra/
…our critical systems and we are afraid to do so primarily to the lack of truly skilled software engineers. IMHO, the AI agents are creating time for us to study what really matters. I would start with Modern Software Engineering by Dave Farley. DM me directly if you want to chat on this topic. https://www.linkedin.com/in/dvydra/
对于“软件工程”，我最认可的定义出自 David Farley《现代软件工程》的第一章：“软件工程是应用经验主义和科学的方法，为软件中的实际问题寻找高效且经济的解决方案。”至于从业者，他…
My preferred definition of software engineering is found in the first chapter of Modern Software Engineering by David Farley Software engineering is the application of an empirical, scientific approach to finding efficient, economic solutions to practical problems in software. As for the practitioner, he…
我目前正在读 David Farley 的《现代软件工程》，我敢说，除非这本书和其他书里指出的所有顾虑都被彻底解决，否则我们绝不会看到程序员被取代。
I'm currently reading Modern Software Engineering by David Farley and I can say that we won't see programmers replaced unless all the concerns pointed out in this book and others has been resolved.
我最近一直在读 Dave Farley 的新书《现代软件工程》。他在书里吐槽了几次 GitFlow 和 Trunk 开发模式的对比。他的很多观点与楼主一致，即代码合并是 GitFlow 的一大痛点。这两种策略我都在不同项目里用过。无论如何…
I’ve been reading Dave Farley’s new book, “Modern Software Engineering” He has a few rants related to GitFlow vs Trunk development. Many of his points agree with OP in that merging is a big pain point in GitFlow. I’ve both used strategies on many different projects. Regardless…
…实践做得很到位，以至于我最近在与几个团队共事时，总忍不住在想整个行业的其他人到底什么时候才能赶上来。我目前在读 Dave "Continuous Delivery" Farley 的《现代软件工程》，以及 Woody Zuill 关于 mob programming 的新书《Software Teaming》。我迫切希望别再陷入这种境地，但我又不太确定该怎么做。我极力避免碰 Microsoft Teams、Scaled…
…practices enough that I've ended up working with a couple teams recently where I kept wondering when the rest of the industry is going to catch up. I'm currently reading Dave "Continuous Delivery" Farley's "Modern Software Engineering", and Woody Zuill's new book about mob programming, "Software Teaming". I'm keen to not end up in this situation again but I'm not quite sure how to do that. I try hard to avoid Microsoft Teams, Scaled…