> 这和聊到“车祸（car accidents）”时用的是同一套话术。 或许可以看看 Jessie Singer 的《There Are No Accidents》这本书： > 我们总能听到这种话：“不好意思，这纯属意外事故。”而且我们已经被深度驯化去坦然接受这种说辞然后翻篇。但正如 Jessie Singer 极其有说服力地论证的那样：……
> It’s the same language used when taking about “car accidents” See perhaps the book There Are no Accidents by Jessie Singer: > We hear it all the time: “Sorry, it was just an accident.” And we’ve been deeply conditioned to just accept that explanation and move on. But as Jessie Singer argues convincingly:…
…在一个你不管干啥都必须把孩子塞进汽车里的社会？只去怪罪整条故障链上的最后一环——醉驾司机、疲惫的家长、737 飞行员——根本无助于真正防患于未然。《There Are No Accidents》。https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/There-Are-No-Accident...
…society where you need to put a child in a car to do virtually anything? Blaming the last failure in a chain of failures -- the drunk driver, the tired parent, the 737 pilot --- prevents prevention. There Are No Accidents. https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/There-Are-No-Accident...
有一本书叫《There Are No Accidents》，深入探讨了这个认知误区，很值得一读。https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2022/02/15/excerpt-there-are-no-...
There's a book called "There Are No Accidents" that goes into depth discussing this fallacy that you should read. https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2022/02/15/excerpt-there-are-no-...
…根据朋友的兴趣推荐了几本。我发现听书要轻松得多，但必须是非虚构类（或者是重温虚构类），而且不能太晦涩难懂。《Cobalt Red》、《The Outlaw Ocean》和《There Are No Accidents》都是过去这一年听到的好书。不过这也是我熬过每天溜狗至少 2 小时运动量的唯一法子了。
…friend a few recommendations based on their interest. I find listening to books far easier but they have to be non-fiction (or a reread of fiction) and not too complicated. Cobalt Red, Outlaw Oceans and There Are No Accidents were all great listens from this past year. But it's the only way I get through the 2hr minimum of exercise my dog needs a day.
…was trippy, too, that the NTSB spokesperson used almost the exact title of this book I just checked out, and happens to be big-ish in the urban planning/transportation community: https://www.amazon.com/There-Are-No-Accidents-Disaster_Who/d... i'm guessing this announcement, the follow-up visit by DOT, was because Trump actually visited the disaster area. maybe that's all there really is to it -- another disaster, one political…
> 这和聊到“车祸（car accidents）”时用的是同一套话术。 或许可以看看 Jessie Singer 的《There Are No Accidents》这本书： > 我们总能听到这种话：“不好意思，这纯属意外事故。”而且我们已经被深度驯化去坦然接受这种说辞然后翻篇。但正如 Jessie Singer 极其有说服力地论证的那样：……
> It’s the same language used when taking about “car accidents” See perhaps the book There Are no Accidents by Jessie Singer: > We hear it all the time: “Sorry, it was just an accident.” And we’ve been deeply conditioned to just accept that explanation and move on. But as Jessie Singer argues convincingly:…
…在一个你不管干啥都必须把孩子塞进汽车里的社会？只去怪罪整条故障链上的最后一环——醉驾司机、疲惫的家长、737 飞行员——根本无助于真正防患于未然。《There Are No Accidents》。https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/There-Are-No-Accident...
…society where you need to put a child in a car to do virtually anything? Blaming the last failure in a chain of failures -- the drunk driver, the tired parent, the 737 pilot --- prevents prevention. There Are No Accidents. https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/There-Are-No-Accident...
有一本书叫《There Are No Accidents》，深入探讨了这个认知误区，很值得一读。https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2022/02/15/excerpt-there-are-no-...
There's a book called "There Are No Accidents" that goes into depth discussing this fallacy that you should read. https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2022/02/15/excerpt-there-are-no-...
如果你还没读过的话，推荐读读《There Are No Accidents》这本书。里面对这个讲得非常细致深入。
I'd recommend reading the book "There Are No Accidents", if you haven't already. Really goes into detail on this.
…根据朋友的兴趣推荐了几本。我发现听书要轻松得多，但必须是非虚构类（或者是重温虚构类），而且不能太晦涩难懂。《Cobalt Red》、《The Outlaw Ocean》和《There Are No Accidents》都是过去这一年听到的好书。不过这也是我熬过每天溜狗至少 2 小时运动量的唯一法子了。
…friend a few recommendations based on their interest. I find listening to books far easier but they have to be non-fiction (or a reread of fiction) and not too complicated. Cobalt Red, Outlaw Oceans and There Are No Accidents were all great listens from this past year. But it's the only way I get through the 2hr minimum of exercise my dog needs a day.
…很离奇的是，NTSB（美国国家运输安全委员会）发言人用的措辞，跟我刚看的一本书的书名几乎一模一样，而且这本书在城市规划/交通领域还挺火的：https://www.amazon.com/There-Are-No-Accidents-Disaster_Who/d... 我猜这次通报、包括 DOT 后续的视察，是因为特朗普真去受灾区转了一圈。也许事情本质上也就这么回事——又一场灾难，一场政治……
…was trippy, too, that the NTSB spokesperson used almost the exact title of this book I just checked out, and happens to be big-ish in the urban planning/transportation community: https://www.amazon.com/There-Are-No-Accidents-Disaster_Who/d... i'm guessing this announcement, the follow-up visit by DOT, was because Trump actually visited the disaster area. maybe that's all there really is to it -- another disaster, one political…