给感兴趣的人推荐一本新书，它总结了目前（或近期）关于经济增长争论的现状：Mark Koyama 和 Jared Rubin 写的《How the World Became Rich: The Historical Origins of Economic Growth》（世界为何富裕）。[1] 各种流派/观点被归入了地理、政治（帝国主义/殖民）、制度和文化等类别。……
For those interested, there is a recent book that summarizes the current (or near-current) state of the debate about growth: How the World Became Rich: The Historical Origins of Economic Growth by Mark Koyama and Jared Rubin.[1] The various schools/arguments are categorized under Geography, Politics (Imperialism/Colonization), Institutions, and Culture.…
我正好在读《how the world became rich》（世界为何富裕），他们对经济“发展”（development）和单纯的“增长”（growth）做了一个很有意思的区分。好玩的是，他们眼中的“发展”恰恰就是你说的“工程师”该有的含义。它是可持续的、结构性的、……
I was just reading "how the world became rich" and they made an interesting distinction economic "development" vs plain "growth". Amusingly, "development" to them means exactly what you're saying "engineer" should mean. It's sustainable, structural,…
给感兴趣的人推荐一本新书，它总结了目前（或近期）关于经济增长争论的现状：Mark Koyama 和 Jared Rubin 写的《How the World Became Rich: The Historical Origins of Economic Growth》（世界为何富裕）。[1] 各种流派/观点被归入了地理、政治（帝国主义/殖民）、制度和文化等类别。……
For those interested, there is a recent book that summarizes the current (or near-current) state of the debate about growth: How the World Became Rich: The Historical Origins of Economic Growth by Mark Koyama and Jared Rubin.[1] The various schools/arguments are categorized under Geography, Politics (Imperialism/Colonization), Institutions, and Culture.…
如果想要详细解释的话，可以看 mark koyama 的《how the world became rich》（世界为何富裕）。
how the world became rich - mark koyama if you want a detailed explanations.
我正好在读《how the world became rich》（世界为何富裕），他们对经济“发展”（development）和单纯的“增长”（growth）做了一个很有意思的区分。好玩的是，他们眼中的“发展”恰恰就是你说的“工程师”该有的含义。它是可持续的、结构性的、……
I was just reading "how the world became rich" and they made an interesting distinction economic "development" vs plain "growth". Amusingly, "development" to them means exactly what you're saying "engineer" should mean. It's sustainable, structural,…