…squashed early on for political reasons. This book that came out recently and it’s extremely compelling. I was fully in the “lab link is conspiracy theory” camp until I read it. https://www.amazon.ca/Viral-Search-COVID-19-Matt-Ridley/dp/0...
The best book I've read on the topic of the lab leak theory is "Viral" by Alina Chan & Matt Ridley. It goes into the nitty-gritty scientific detail as well, but also covers some of the things you mentioned too.
……不够坦诚。中国没有实话实说。别有用心的各方太多了，说什么都不可信。中国在“让人觉得他们在掩盖什么”这件事上表现得太典型了。我读了阿丽娜·陈和马特·里德利写的《病毒：探寻COVID-19的源头》（Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19），它让我确信实验室泄漏论至少是相当有可能的。疫情爆发地距离武汉病毒研究所（WIV）如此之近——而研究所当时正在进行 gain-of-function……
…behind honest. China isn't being honest. There's too many parties with ulterior motives to trust anything being said. China has done a great job of looking like they're covering something up. I read "Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19 by Alina Chan and Matt Ridley" and it convinced me the lab leak theory was at least fairly likely. The proximity of the outbreak to WIV -- which was doing gain-of-function…
"Viral" by Alina Chan and Matt Ridley is worth reading. But I don't think there's much doubt now that Sars-CoV2 was the result of reckless gain-of-function research conducted jointly between China's Wuhan Institute…
The article shouldn’t have quote this person in the first place - there are plenty of serious investigations into the lab leak theory from reputable virologists. I recommend Alina Chan’s new book: Viral. This clarification also masquerades as a clarification of something important. This person quoted by the tabloid is irrelevant here. In fact this article does more damage to the credibility of lab theory…
…public in time for printing). Covers everything else we know so far - all about furin cleavage, the market-based arguments, and especially the ‘DEFUSE’ grant application document to DARPA. It’s titled Viral and it’s written by Alina Chan and Matt Ridley (he was the author of ‘How Innovation Works’.)
……由于政治原因在早期就被压下去了。最近出的这本书非常令人信服。在读它之前，我完全是坚定站在“实验室泄漏论就是阴谋论”阵营的。https://www.amazon.ca/Viral-Search-COVID-19-Matt-Ridley/dp/0...
…squashed early on for political reasons. This book that came out recently and it’s extremely compelling. I was fully in the “lab link is conspiracy theory” camp until I read it. https://www.amazon.ca/Viral-Search-COVID-19-Matt-Ridley/dp/0...
关于实验室泄漏理论这个话题，我读过最好的一本书就是阿丽娜·陈（Alina Chan）和马特·里德利（Matt Ridley）合著的《病毒》（Viral）。它不仅深入到了具体详尽的科学细节，还涵盖了你提到的一些事情。
The best book I've read on the topic of the lab leak theory is "Viral" by Alina Chan & Matt Ridley. It goes into the nitty-gritty scientific detail as well, but also covers some of the things you mentioned too.
……不够坦诚。中国没有实话实说。别有用心的各方太多了，说什么都不可信。中国在“让人觉得他们在掩盖什么”这件事上表现得太典型了。我读了阿丽娜·陈和马特·里德利写的《病毒：探寻COVID-19的源头》（Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19），它让我确信实验室泄漏论至少是相当有可能的。疫情爆发地距离武汉病毒研究所（WIV）如此之近——而研究所当时正在进行 gain-of-function……
…behind honest. China isn't being honest. There's too many parties with ulterior motives to trust anything being said. China has done a great job of looking like they're covering something up. I read "Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19 by Alina Chan and Matt Ridley" and it convinced me the lab leak theory was at least fairly likely. The proximity of the outbreak to WIV -- which was doing gain-of-function…
阿丽娜·陈和马特·里德利合著的《病毒》（Viral）很值得一读。不过我觉得现在基本没什么疑问了：Sars-CoV2 就是中国武汉病毒研究所联合开展的鲁莽的 gain-of-function 研究导致的……
"Viral" by Alina Chan and Matt Ridley is worth reading. But I don't think there's much doubt now that Sars-CoV2 was the result of reckless gain-of-function research conducted jointly between China's Wuhan Institute…
这篇文章一开始就不该引用这个人——知名病毒学家对实验室泄漏理论进行过大量严肃的调查。我推荐阿丽娜·陈的新书《病毒》（Viral）。这个所谓的澄清还伪装成是在澄清什么要紧事。八卦小报引用的这个人在这里根本无关紧要。事实上，这篇文章反而更加损害了实验室泄漏假说的可信度……
The article shouldn’t have quote this person in the first place - there are plenty of serious investigations into the lab leak theory from reputable virologists. I recommend Alina Chan’s new book: Viral. This clarification also masquerades as a clarification of something important. This person quoted by the tabloid is irrelevant here. In fact this article does more damage to the credibility of lab theory…
……没来得及在付印前公开）。涵盖了截至目前我们所知道的其他一切——关于 furin cleavage（弗林蛋白酶裂解位点）、海鲜市场相关的论据，尤其是向 DARPA 提交的“DEFUSE”项目资助申请文件。书名叫《病毒》（Viral），由阿丽娜·陈和马特·里德利（他也是《创新如何发生》的作者）合著。
…public in time for printing). Covers everything else we know so far - all about furin cleavage, the market-based arguments, and especially the ‘DEFUSE’ grant application document to DARPA. It’s titled Viral and it’s written by Alina Chan and Matt Ridley (he was the author of ‘How Innovation Works’.)