《核电为何失败》封面

核电为何失败

Why Nuclear Power Has Been a Flop

Jack Devanney · 初版 2020 年

2人推荐
3位读者提及
3次提及

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • …大卫·约翰·卡梅伦·麦凯爵士 https://withouthotair.com/ 瓦茨拉夫·斯米尔的书:Energy and Civilization: A History、Energy Transitions: Global and National Perspectives、How the World Really Works、《为什么核能不能成事》(Why Nuclear Power Has Been A Flop)——21世纪的哥廷根之结 https://gordianknotbook.com/ 按目前的消耗速率,化石燃料储量依然庞大,天然气/石油至少还能用100年,煤炭200年。我担心的是,…

    …Sir David John Cameron MacKay https://withouthotair.com/ Books by Vaclav Smil: Energy and Civilization: A History Energy Transitions: Global and National Perspectives How the World Really Works "Why Nuclear Power Has Been A Flop" - The Gordian Knot of the 21st Century https://gordianknotbook.com/ There are still big hydrocarbon reserves, gas/oil for atleast 100 years, coal 200 years, at current consumption rates. I fear that,…

  • 《为什么核能不能成事》(Why Nuclear Power Has Been a Flop)[0] 显然很好地解释了在过去50来年里,我们的文明究竟是在何种意义上倒退了。简而言之,就是“尽可能合理压低风险”(As Low (risk) As Reasonably Achievable)的原则。…

    "Why Nuclear Power Has Been a Flop" [0] apparently does a good job of explaining exactly how our civilization has regressed in this sense over the past 50ish years. In short, it's the principle of "As Low (risk) As Reasonably Achievable".…

  • ……但我更想听到一些具体意见,即如果监管有机会改进核能的话,监管体系到底可以怎么改。https://rootsofprogress.org/devanney-on-the-nuclear-flop 是对 Jack Devanney 所著《为什么核能不能成事》的书评。根据书评来看,简单来说就是监管机构对辐射采用了错误的威胁模型(LNT),以及一种实际上要求核电必须无利可图的监管模式……

    …But I would like to hear more specific complaints about how regulations could change, if it has the chance to improve nuclear. https://rootsofprogress.org/devanney-on-the-nuclear-flop is a review of "Why Nuclear Power Has Been a Flop" by Jack Devanney. Based on the review, the short version is that the regulators use the wrong threat model for radiation (LNT), and a regulatory model which effectively requires nuclear to be unprofitable…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助