心灵的种类
Kinds of minds
Daniel C. Dennett · 初版 1996 年
2人推荐
3位读者提及
3次提及
在Kinds of Minds一书中，Dennett提出了终极的形而上学之问：什么是心智？除提问者之外，谁还拥有心智？Dennett融合了哲学、人工智能与神经生物学的思想，带领读者踏上一场引人入胜的探索之旅，探讨了诸如以下引人深思的议题：我们中是否真有人能确切知晓他人脑中所想？人类心智与动物心智（尤其是具备复杂行为能力的动物）的区别何在？例如，若这类动物神奇地获得了语言能力，它们的群体是否会演变出智
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……哀悼。事情没那么显而易见。尤其是家养动物，你描述的那种行为很可能是为了在人类身边生存而演化出来的。推荐阅读：Daniel Dennett 的《心智种种》（Kinds of Minds，http://www.amazon.com/Kinds-Of-Minds-Understanding-Conscious... ）维特根斯坦关于“如果狮子会说话它会说什么”的论述：http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=628eVJgHD6I （这菠萝真甜）
…mourning. It's not so obvious. Especially with domestic animals, the kind of behaviour you are describing may have evolved in order to survive in humans' company. Recommended reading: Daniel Dennett's Kinds of Minds ( http://www.amazon.com/Kinds-Of-Minds-Understanding-Conscious... ) Wittgenstein on what a lion would say if he could speak: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=628eVJgHD6I (This is a very pleasant pineapple)
如果你想要一个真正有价值的哲学例子，我觉得 Daniel Dennett 的《心智种种》对意识起源的探讨非常引人入胜。它不是绝对的“事实”，但确实提供了思考这个问题的有趣视角；这些思路甚至能推动实验或者进一步的……
If you want an example of genuinely valuable philosophy, I found "Kinds of Minds" by Daniel Dennett to be a compelling discussion of the origins of consciousness. It's not "fact" but it does provide interesting ways to think about the issue; ways that could drive experiment or further…
……具身认知（embodied cognition）？即便心智可能源自肉体，但心智所特有的计算过程，难道就不能在一个非肉体中被激活吗？我目前正在读 Daniel Dennett 的《心智种种》，深受其启发。https://www.amazon.com/Kinds-Minds-Understanding-Consciousne...
…embodied cognition? Even though a mind may arise from a body, could the computational processes characteristic of a mind not also be activated from a non-body? I'm reading and influenced right now by Kinds Of Minds by Daniel Dennett. https://www.amazon.com/Kinds-Minds-Understanding-Consciousne...