…stand to be less ignorant of the industry he's discussing. For one thing, Tripmaster Monkey is at least the fifth book that Kingston has written (I can't find a complete bibliography.) and Dennett's Content and Consciousness was published in 1969, 22 years before Consciousness Explained. Both of them had already "found their audiences" before those books were written, much less published. Further, Dennett has published many…
……断章取义引用 Dennett，是那些懒得去真正理解他到底在说什么的人惯用的招数。我读过他所有关于意识的书，一路可以追溯到那本如果我没记错的话出版于 1969 年的《Content and Consciousness》。我也读过足够多批评他的文章，清楚他们玩的都是些什么把戏。抱歉，我可不吃这一套。> 维基百科 这么说你觉得维基百科在复杂的……
…Quoting Dennett out of context is the go-to move for people who can't be bothered to actually engage with what he's actually saying. I've read all of his books on consciousness, going all the way back to Content and Consciousness, published in, IIRC, 1969. And I've also read enough of his critics to understand the games they play. Sorry, not buying it. > Wikipedia So you consider Wikipedia to be a reliable source about a complex…
……对他讨论的这个行业少点无知才说得过去。首先，《Tripmaster Monkey》至少是 Kingston 写的第五本书了（我找不到完整的作品年表），而 Dennett 的《Content and Consciousness》早在 1969 年就出版了，比《Consciousness Explained》早了整整 22 年。这两位在写出这些书之前，就早就已经“找到了自己的受众”，更别说出版之后了。而且，Dennett 还出版过许多……
…stand to be less ignorant of the industry he's discussing. For one thing, Tripmaster Monkey is at least the fifth book that Kingston has written (I can't find a complete bibliography.) and Dennett's Content and Consciousness was published in 1969, 22 years before Consciousness Explained. Both of them had already "found their audiences" before those books were written, much less published. Further, Dennett has published many…
……断章取义引用 Dennett，是那些懒得去真正理解他到底在说什么的人惯用的招数。我读过他所有关于意识的书，一路可以追溯到那本如果我没记错的话出版于 1969 年的《Content and Consciousness》。我也读过足够多批评他的文章，清楚他们玩的都是些什么把戏。抱歉，我可不吃这一套。> 维基百科 这么说你觉得维基百科在复杂的……
…Quoting Dennett out of context is the go-to move for people who can't be bothered to actually engage with what he's actually saying. I've read all of his books on consciousness, going all the way back to Content and Consciousness, published in, IIRC, 1969. And I've also read enough of his critics to understand the games they play. Sorry, not buying it. > Wikipedia So you consider Wikipedia to be a reliable source about a complex…