《最危险的迷信》封面

最危险的迷信

Most Dangerous Superstition

Larken Rose · 初版 2011 年

3人推荐
4位读者提及
4次提及

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • ……对于亲历者而言,暴露出某些“专家”自认比任何人都清楚怎样才是为了“公共利益”好的一种傲慢与精英主义。对我说的话感兴趣的人,我推荐一本书——Larkin Rose 的《The Most Dangerous Superstition》。如果你觉得我是错的,请继续这么认为。我完全支持!我本就没打算也没指望能说服你。

    …who experience it, reveals a certain hubris and elitism that certain "experts" know what is best for everyone, for the "common good". A book I recommend for those interested in what I'm saying is "The Most Dangerous Superstition" by Larkin Rose. If you think I'm wrong, please continue to do so. I am supportive! I don't intend or expect to reach you.

  • 去看看 Larken Rose 的《The most dangerous superstition》这本书吧。你应该能在网上免费搜到 PDF 版本。

    Check out the book "The most dangerous superstition" by Larken Rose. You should be able to find a PDF version online for free.

  • 因为政府一直在给人们洗脑,让人以为没有他们社会就无法保持稳定和安全。我认为事实恰恰相反。建议读一读 Larken Rose 的《The Most Dangerous Superstition》。我觉得在有邻里守望、当地人团结起来击退犯罪分子的地方,比在警察偶尔才露个面(要是他们刚开完超速罚单有空的话)的地方安全多了……

    Because governments indoctrinate people into thinking they're needed to keep society stable and safe. I'd argue the opposite is true. I suggest reading Larken Rose - The Most Dangerous Superstition. I feel way safer in places with a neighbourhood watch and local people banding together to fend off criminals over places where the police may show up some times, if they're done fining people for going…

  • 确实如此,几乎全世界都这样。正如 Larken Rose 在《The most dangerous superstition》中所写:“学校表面上的目的是教授阅读、写作、数学以及其他学术领域的思想。但‘教育’机构实际上传达的信息,却有效得多地……

    Yes indeed, practically worldwide. As Larken Rose writes in "The most dangerous superstition": "The purported purpose of schools is to teach reading, writing, mathematics, and other academic fields of thought. But the message that institutions of “education” actually teach, far more effectively…

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助