《Trans》封面

Trans

Helen Joyce · 初版 2021 年

2人推荐
3位读者提及
3次提及

Hacker News 上怎么说

  • ……绝对不会发表这种评论。我对这些问题的理解归结起来大概是:- 酷儿理论(queer theory)是某种跟同性恋群体有关的还算正经的学术探索;- 跨性别(trans)不过是同性恋权益2.0罢了;显然谁要是有质疑,谁就是无可救药的偏执狂(bigot)。两样我都不是特别上心,但听上去都挺合情合理的。然而,后来我开始阅读关于……

    …never have made such a comment. My understanding about the issues boiled down to approximately: - queer theory is some sort of reasonably academic pursuit that has something to do with gay people - trans is just gay rights 2.0; clearly anyone who has any concerns is a raging bigot Neither was a core interest of mine, but they seemed reasonable enough. However, eventually, I started reading about the…

  • 写得非常好,很值得一读。Helen Joyce的《Trans》和Kathleen Stock的《Material Girls》也都是对这一运动极佳的批判性著作。

    It's a very good read. Helen Joyce's Trans and Kathleen Stock's Material Girls are also excellent critiques of this movement.

  • 道金斯(Dawkins)访谈《Trans》一书的作者Helen Joyce:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hu72Lu5FqE4

    Dawkins interview with Helen Joyce, author of Trans: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hu72Lu5FqE4

正在加载完整评论……

键盘快捷键

/
聚焦搜索框
j / k
下一本 / 上一本
Enter
打开选中的书
Esc
关闭 / 返回
g h
回到首页
g b
值得读精选
g t
历史总榜
g r
上升最快
g l
我的书架
?
显示本帮助