……左翼/右翼的政治观点，假定你的政府在15年后会变成极权暴政，并根据你今天的购物习惯把你家所有孩子都标记为“重点关注”等等等等……另请参阅路易斯·登比茨·布兰代斯与塞缪尔·D·沃伦的《论隐私权》（The Right to Privacy）：http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37368/37368-h/37368-h.htm
…left/right wing political opinion, assume your government will become oppressive in 15 years and mark up all your kids for "special attention" based on your shopping habits today etc etc... See also: "The Right to Privacy by Louis Dembitz Brandeis and Samuel D. Warren" http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37368/37368-h/37368-h.htm
…neither history nor legal precedent supports that interpretation unequivocally (even with regard to the government specifically; you can read some really interesting Constitutional history about the "right to privacy" and how it arose as a concept in the late 1800s; Brandeis's "The Right to Privacy" is a fascinating historical document"). The only true remedy to this problem is laws enacted by Congress. We need to…
虽然跟匿名性（Anonymity）没有直接关系，但我也强烈推荐沃伦和布兰代斯的《论隐私权》（The Right to Privacy），用来反驳那些“如果你没什么好隐瞒的……”之类的论调：http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/priva...
While not directly related to Anonymity, I also strongly recommend Warren and Brandeis: "The Right to Privacy" as reading on some arguments against the "... if you have nothing to hide"-arguments: http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/priva...
数据和元数据隐私有一套源自布兰代斯 1890 年《论隐私权》的传统。你说的没错，这种传统部分植根于第四修正案的法理，但它在英国普通法中有更深厚的渊源。埃米·贾达（Amy Gajda）的《寻找与隐藏》（Seek and Hide）是一本通俗易懂的入门书……
There is a tradition of data and metadata privacy based on Brandeis's "The Right to Privacy" from 1890. You are correct that this tradition is partly rooted in 4th amendment jurisprudence, but it has deeper foundations in English common law. Amy Gajda's Seek and Hide is an accessible introduction…
我读过的关于这个话题最好的评述之一，至今仍然是：沃伦和布兰代斯的《论隐私权》（THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY）——最初发表于 1891 年（！）：http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37368/37368-h/37368-h.htm 文笔极佳，时至今日依然发人深省。
One of the best commentaries I've read on this topic, is still: "THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY." by Warren and Brandeis -- originally published in 1891(!): http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37368/37368-h/37368-h.htm Very well written, and illuminating to this day.
……左翼/右翼的政治观点，假定你的政府在15年后会变成极权暴政，并根据你今天的购物习惯把你家所有孩子都标记为“重点关注”等等等等……另请参阅路易斯·登比茨·布兰代斯与塞缪尔·D·沃伦的《论隐私权》（The Right to Privacy）：http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37368/37368-h/37368-h.htm
…left/right wing political opinion, assume your government will become oppressive in 15 years and mark up all your kids for "special attention" based on your shopping habits today etc etc... See also: "The Right to Privacy by Louis Dembitz Brandeis and Samuel D. Warren" http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37368/37368-h/37368-h.htm
……无论是历史还是法律先例都不支持这种毫无疑义的解读（即使具体针对政府也是如此；你可以去读读关于“隐私权”的一些非常有意思的宪法历史，看它在19世纪末是如何作为一个概念诞生的；布兰代斯的《论隐私权》是一份极有魅力的历史文献）。解决这个问题的唯一真正良方就是国会立法。我们需要……
…neither history nor legal precedent supports that interpretation unequivocally (even with regard to the government specifically; you can read some really interesting Constitutional history about the "right to privacy" and how it arose as a concept in the late 1800s; Brandeis's "The Right to Privacy" is a fascinating historical document"). The only true remedy to this problem is laws enacted by Congress. We need to…
虽然跟匿名性（Anonymity）没有直接关系，但我也强烈推荐沃伦和布兰代斯的《论隐私权》（The Right to Privacy），用来反驳那些“如果你没什么好隐瞒的……”之类的论调：http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/priva...
While not directly related to Anonymity, I also strongly recommend Warren and Brandeis: "The Right to Privacy" as reading on some arguments against the "... if you have nothing to hide"-arguments: http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/priva...
数据和元数据隐私有一套源自布兰代斯 1890 年《论隐私权》的传统。你说的没错，这种传统部分植根于第四修正案的法理，但它在英国普通法中有更深厚的渊源。埃米·贾达（Amy Gajda）的《寻找与隐藏》（Seek and Hide）是一本通俗易懂的入门书……
There is a tradition of data and metadata privacy based on Brandeis's "The Right to Privacy" from 1890. You are correct that this tradition is partly rooted in 4th amendment jurisprudence, but it has deeper foundations in English common law. Amy Gajda's Seek and Hide is an accessible introduction…
我读过的关于这个话题最好的评述之一，至今仍然是：沃伦和布兰代斯的《论隐私权》（THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY）——最初发表于 1891 年（！）：http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37368/37368-h/37368-h.htm 文笔极佳，时至今日依然发人深省。
One of the best commentaries I've read on this topic, is still: "THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY." by Warren and Brandeis -- originally published in 1891(!): http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37368/37368-h/37368-h.htm Very well written, and illuminating to this day.
沃伦和布兰代斯合著的《论隐私权》（The Right to Privacy）。http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/priva...
"The Right to Privacy" by Warren and Brandeis. http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/priva...