…enjoyed: Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State and Utopia; Derek Parfit's Reasons and Persons; Peter Singer's Practical Ethics; Graham Priest's In Contradiction; Graham Oppy's Arguing about Gods; Edward Feser's Five Proofs of the Existence of God – that's a rather eclectic and idiosyncratic list, including books by authors which radically disagree with each other (e.g. Feser's book tries to prove God exists, Oppy's book argues all known proofs…
…like that philistines like Dawkins enjoy dumping on. The best arguments demonstrate God's existence as a necessary fact following from evident premises. (Btw, Edward Feser has recently publishes a book, "Five Proofs of the Existence of God", on the subject, selecting five that he holds to be particularly important.)
…intelligent, and omniscient. 26. But for there to be such a thing is for God to exist. 27. So, God exists. For the details see the twenty pages of chapter five ("The Rationalist Proof") in his book Five Proofs of the Existence of God: * https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35592365-five-proofs-of-... Also covered are: Aristotle, Neo-Platonic (Plotinus), Augustinian, and Thomistic. (The above is the summary which I've transcribed.…
From Five Proofs of the Existence of God, Edward Feser (2017), Chapter 6 (§Omniscience), pp. 212f: > Recall that I emphasized that God can hardly be mistaken about the cat being on the mat, insofar as he is the cause of the cat's being on the…
如果你想反驳费瑟，我建议别找 Carrier：> 通俗无神论作家 Richard Carrier 在其博客的一篇文章中狂妄地宣称自己“打假！”（原文带感叹号）了《上帝存在的五种证明》。这简直是一场荒谬而低劣的表演。说 Carrier 在打稻草人都算侮辱了稻草人，因为稻草人通常起码还和被讨论的论点有几分粗糙的相似之处……
I would not turn to Carrier if you wish to counter-argue Feser: > In an article at his blog, pop atheist writer Richard Carrier grandly claims to have “debunked!” (exclamation point in the original) Five Proofs of the Existence of God. It’s a bizarrely incompetent performance. To say that Carrier attacks straw men would be an insult to straw men, which usually bear at least a crude resemblance to the argument under consideration.…
……读得挺过瘾的：罗伯特·诺齐克的《无政府、国家与乌托邦》；德里克·帕菲特的《理与人》；彼得·辛格的《实践伦理学》；格雷厄姆·普里斯特的《处于矛盾之中》；格雷厄姆·奥皮的《关于诸神的争论》；爱德华·费瑟的《上帝存在的五种证明》——这份书单相当庞杂且个性十足，收录的作者之间观点针锋相对（比如费瑟的书试图证明上帝存在，而奥皮的书则论证所有已知的证明……
…enjoyed: Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State and Utopia; Derek Parfit's Reasons and Persons; Peter Singer's Practical Ethics; Graham Priest's In Contradiction; Graham Oppy's Arguing about Gods; Edward Feser's Five Proofs of the Existence of God – that's a rather eclectic and idiosyncratic list, including books by authors which radically disagree with each other (e.g. Feser's book tries to prove God exists, Oppy's book argues all known proofs…
……那种道金斯这类市侩最喜欢踩上一脚的论调。最好的论证能够表明，上帝的存在是从显而易见的前提中推导出来的必然事实。（顺便提一句，爱德华·费瑟最近出版了一本关于这个主题的书《上帝存在的五种证明》，挑选了他认为尤为重要的五个证明。）
…like that philistines like Dawkins enjoy dumping on. The best arguments demonstrate God's existence as a necessary fact following from evident premises. (Btw, Edward Feser has recently publishes a book, "Five Proofs of the Existence of God", on the subject, selecting five that he holds to be particularly important.)
他还写过《上帝存在的五种证明》。他的著作根本转化不了任何自然主义者。
He also wrote Five Proofs of the Existence of God. His writings won’t convert any naturalist.
……具有智慧且全知。26. 但存在这样一个事物，就等于上帝存在。27. 所以，上帝存在。具体细节可参阅其著作《上帝存在的五种证明》第五章（“理性主义证明”）整整二十页的内容：* https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35592365-five-proofs-of-... 书中还涵盖了：亚里士多德、新柏拉图主义（普罗提诺）、奥古斯丁主义以及托马斯主义。（以上是我摘抄的总结。……
…intelligent, and omniscient. 26. But for there to be such a thing is for God to exist. 27. So, God exists. For the details see the twenty pages of chapter five ("The Rationalist Proof") in his book Five Proofs of the Existence of God: * https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35592365-five-proofs-of-... Also covered are: Aristotle, Neo-Platonic (Plotinus), Augustinian, and Thomistic. (The above is the summary which I've transcribed.…
摘自爱德华·费瑟（2017）《上帝存在的五种证明》第六章（§全知），第212页及后续页：> 回想一下，我曾强调过，上帝几乎不可能在“猫在垫子上”这件事上出错，因为正是他使得猫处于垫子……
From Five Proofs of the Existence of God, Edward Feser (2017), Chapter 6 (§Omniscience), pp. 212f: > Recall that I emphasized that God can hardly be mistaken about the cat being on the mat, insofar as he is the cause of the cat's being on the…
如果你想反驳费瑟，我建议别找 Carrier：> 通俗无神论作家 Richard Carrier 在其博客的一篇文章中狂妄地宣称自己“打假！”（原文带感叹号）了《上帝存在的五种证明》。这简直是一场荒谬而低劣的表演。说 Carrier 在打稻草人都算侮辱了稻草人，因为稻草人通常起码还和被讨论的论点有几分粗糙的相似之处……
I would not turn to Carrier if you wish to counter-argue Feser: > In an article at his blog, pop atheist writer Richard Carrier grandly claims to have “debunked!” (exclamation point in the original) Five Proofs of the Existence of God. It’s a bizarrely incompetent performance. To say that Carrier attacks straw men would be an insult to straw men, which usually bear at least a crude resemblance to the argument under consideration.…