为劫掠辩护
In Defense of Looting
Vicky Osterweil · 初版 2021 年
2人推荐
15位读者提及
18次提及
为什么值得读
- 呈现绝大多数人并不熟悉的思考角度
- 观点极具颠覆性并引发广泛热议
“抢劫——一群人公开、坦然且直接地抢夺物资——是社会动荡中可能发生的最极端行动之一。就连自称激进分子的人也往往与抢劫者划清界限，担心暴力手段会给更广泛的运动抹黑。然而，在这本论证精巧的纠偏之作中，Vicky Osterweil 辩称，尽管抢劫在当今社会备受诟病，但它一直以来都是我们瓦解资本主义和白人至上主义最强大的工具之一。掠夺商品和破坏财产是财富再分配的一种直接手段
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
嗨。看到你在之前的帖子里提到后，我刚才特意去读了《In Defense of Looting》[1]，之前我从没见过。太精彩了。我觉得你应该读读看。它提供了一个很多人可能都不熟悉的、非常有趣的视角…
Hi. I just went off and read In Defense of Looting[1], which I'd never seen before, following its mention in your earlier post. It's fascinating. I think you should read it. It presents a very interesting perspective that many might not be familiar with…
是这个吗？2020 年 8 月 27 日，Code Switch 的 Natalie Escobar 就 Vicky Osterweil 的新书《In Defense Of Looting》采访了她。该节目最初标题为“One Author's Argument 'In Defense Of Looting'”（一位作者“为劫掠辩护”的论点），随后被改名为“One Author's Controversial View: 'In Defense Of Looting'”（一位作者的争议观点：“为劫掠辩护”）。https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2020/08/27/906642178...…
Was it this? On August 27, 2020, Natalie Escobar for Code Switch interviewed Vicky Osterweil about her book In Defense Of Looting. The segment was titled "One Author's Argument 'In Defense Of Looting'", and was subsequently retitled "One Author's Controversial View: 'In Defense Of Looting'". https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2020/08/27/906642178...…
…早在特朗普和选举之前就以 BLM 抗议开始了。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferguson_unrest 一些知名活动家甚至为这些行为辩护。比如 DeRay Mckesson 就称《In Defense of Looting》是“绝对的必读书目”。https://twitter.com/deray/status/524704650218729473
…starting with BLM protests long before Trump and the election. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferguson_unrest Some prominent activists have even defended these acts. For example, Deeray McKesson called In Defense of Looting "absolute required reading". https://twitter.com/deray/status/524704650218729473
…支持那个？官方层面上谁代表 BLM 发言？负责写 blacklivesmatter.com 网站的人确实支持了弗格森骚乱。[1] Simone Sebastian 在《华盛顿邮报》上也一样。[2] DeRay Mckesson 称《In Defense of Looting》是“绝对的必读书目”。[3] 这种名单列都列不完。而你自己刚才就在为骚乱辩护。前一句话还在替骚乱辩护，后一句话就睁眼说瞎话称 BLM 不支持骚乱。而且说到…
…support that? Who speaks for BLM officially? Whoever writes the website blacklivesmatter.com did support the Ferguson riots. [1] As did Simone Sebastian in the Washington Post. [2] DeRay Mckesson called In Defense of Looting "absolute required reading". [3] The list goes on and on. And you yourself just defended riots. In one sentence you defend riots and in the very next falsely claim BLM doesn't support riots. And speaking…
…更喜欢别的用词，但我估计你在我用“BLM 抗议”这个词时就知道我指的是什么。第三，就算《我的奋斗》（Mein Kampf）可能因为其历史重要性而成为必读，那你倒说说看，如果不是因为其倡导的立场，《In Defense of Looting》凭什么成为必读？……所以这就直接被 downvote 还无人回复——凭什么啊？
…prefer other terms but I suspect that you know what I'm referring to when I use the term "BLM protests". Third, while Mein Kampf may be required reading for its historical importance, do tell, why would In Defense of Looting be required reading if not for the position it advocates? ... So this is being downvoted without response - why?
…经济体制以及其他社会犯下的不公，同时伴随着对资本主义和美国历史的批判。当像 DeRay Mckesson 这样的知名活动家推荐像《In Defense of Looting》这样的文章时，很可能会鼓励他的一些追随者去打砸抢/劫掠（looting）。
…economic systems and the injustices perpetrated by other societies alongside the critique of capitalism and American history. When a prominent activist like DeRay Mckesson recommends an article like In Defense of Looting, it's likely to encourage looting by some of his followers.