These topics are discussed in greater depth in Kasparov's book, "Deep Thinking". My view of the book: Very well written (and occasionally engrossing), well thought out, and strikes a more hopeful/reasonable tone that anything else I've seen on the subject.
我由衷推荐卡斯帕罗夫的《深度思考：人工智能的终点与人类创造力的起点》（Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins）。讲的是当年深蓝（Deep Blue）人机对弈前后的故事。
I can heartily recommend "Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins" by Kasparov. It's his story on what happened around Deep Blue.
Not the most informative headline. "He has written many books, but this may be his most important." I firmly doubt it. The story is an ad for a book, Deep Thinking, about computer chess, and in it "Kasparov uses his unrivalled experience to look into the future of intelligent machines" something he appears eminently unqualified to do. Karpov said that Kasparov…
> But ultimately, Seltz-Axmacher believes, the tools he’s developing will be good for truckers. He cites a new book by Garry Kasparov, Deep Thinking, in which the chess great observes that middling chess players who play with the help of a standard computer are reliably better than either grandmasters or supercomputers by themselves. “I think humans…
With respect to IBM: they've been at the marketing game for a long time. In Deep Thinking, Garry Kasparov details their ruthlessness with him in the 90s, where it suddenly went from a friendly match to a bloodthirsty drive to beat him at all costs. He wasn't even allowed to study the machine's…
There's one match in which it was not a game of perfect information, as Garry Kasparov says in "Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins": If you consider "perfect information" to include "knowledge of your opponent's previous games" (that's a big IF) then he did not have it…
卡斯帕罗夫在《深度思考》（Deep Thinking）一书中对这些话题进行了更深入的探讨。我对这本书的看法是：写得非常好（偶尔还引人入胜），构思周密，而且相比我在这个主题上读过的其他任何东西，它传递出的基调都更为乐观和理性。
These topics are discussed in greater depth in Kasparov's book, "Deep Thinking". My view of the book: Very well written (and occasionally engrossing), well thought out, and strikes a more hopeful/reasonable tone that anything else I've seen on the subject.
我由衷推荐卡斯帕罗夫的《深度思考：人工智能的终点与人类创造力的起点》（Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins）。讲的是当年深蓝（Deep Blue）人机对弈前后的故事。
I can heartily recommend "Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins" by Kasparov. It's his story on what happened around Deep Blue.
这标题起得实在没啥营养。“他写过很多书，但这本可能是最重要的。”我对此深表怀疑。这报道纯粹是给那本讲电脑下棋的《深度思考》打广告，书里号称“卡斯帕罗夫利用他无可匹敌的经验展望了智能机器的未来”——而这事儿看起来他显然完全不够格去评判。卡尔波夫就曾说过卡斯帕罗夫……
Not the most informative headline. "He has written many books, but this may be his most important." I firmly doubt it. The story is an ad for a book, Deep Thinking, about computer chess, and in it "Kasparov uses his unrivalled experience to look into the future of intelligent machines" something he appears eminently unqualified to do. Karpov said that Kasparov…
> 但最终，Seltz-Axmacher 认为，他正在研发的工具对卡车司机是有益的。他引用了加里·卡斯帕罗夫的新书《深度思考》，这位棋坛泰斗在书中指出，借助普通电脑辅助的普通棋手，其水平稳赢单打独斗的特级大师或超级计算机。“我认为人类……
> But ultimately, Seltz-Axmacher believes, the tools he’s developing will be good for truckers. He cites a new book by Garry Kasparov, Deep Thinking, in which the chess great observes that middling chess players who play with the help of a standard computer are reliably better than either grandmasters or supercomputers by themselves. “I think humans…
说到 IBM：他们在营销这套把戏上可是老手了。在《深度思考》里，加里·卡斯帕罗夫详细讲述了他们在 90 年代对他的手段有多狠：原本一场友谊赛，突然就变成了不惜一切代价要干翻他的嗜血追逐。他们甚至都不允许他研究那台机器的……
With respect to IBM: they've been at the marketing game for a long time. In Deep Thinking, Garry Kasparov details their ruthlessness with him in the 90s, where it suddenly went from a friendly match to a bloodthirsty drive to beat him at all costs. He wasn't even allowed to study the machine's…
有那么一局比赛并不是一场完全信息博弈，正如加里·卡斯帕罗夫在《深度思考：人工智能的终点与人类创造力的起点》中所说：如果你把“完全信息”定义为包括“了解你对手过往的对局历史”（这假设可太大了），那他当时根本就不具备这种信息……
There's one match in which it was not a game of perfect information, as Garry Kasparov says in "Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins": If you consider "perfect information" to include "knowledge of your opponent's previous games" (that's a big IF) then he did not have it…