这个观点很棒。你可能会喜欢 Lee Drutman 的书《打破两党死局》（Breaking the Two Party Doom Loop），他的一个核心观点是：固定众议院的席位规模扭曲了国会的代表性，并加剧了极度党派化。他建议将代表人数增加到 700 人……
This is a good point. You might enjoy Lee Drutman's book, "Breaking the Two Party Doom Loop," where one of his key observations is that fixing the size of the House has distorted representation in Congress and contributed to hyper partisanship. He recommends increasing the size to 700 representatives…
到目前为止，我在 2022 年最喜欢的书有：政治类 ----------- 《为什么我们极化了》（Why We're Polarized） 《打破两党死局：美国多党民主的理据》（Breaking the Two Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America） 我喜欢把这两本书结合起来看，因为它们就像同一枚硬币的两面，而且提供了一种我觉得很多政治类书籍都不具备的东西：对一个更好……
So far my favorite books of 2022 are: Political ----------- Why We're Polarized Breaking the Two Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America I liked these two books together because they are two sides to the same coin and offers something I feel a lot of political books don't, a hope for a better…
Yes. And to paraphrase Lee Drutman's take in Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: far-right parties in the EU tend to get about 10% of the vote. And in a way that's bad (they get seats in parliament!). But in another way, it's good: they can't claim to be "the voice of the masses"…
…incumbent when the small group of people voting in a primary are very biased, and then the people voting in the general election really don't want the candidate from the other party. I suggest reading "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America" by Lee Drutman. https://www.amazon.com/Breaking-Two-Party-Doom-Loop-Multipar...
……很感兴趣但深表怀疑。一个真正的中间派政党确实会有帮助，但有很多结构性原因导致这不太可能发生，而这些问题必须先得到解决。关于这一点有本很棒的书叫《打破两党死局》（Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop）。我强烈推荐。
…interested but highly skeptical. A genuine center party would help, but there are many structural reasons why it’s not likely, and those would have to be addressed. There’s a great book about this titled “Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop.” I highly recommend it.
有一本讲这个的书写得还（算）不错，叫《打破两党死局》（Breaking the two-party doom loop）。* 现在大家越来越关注联邦（而非地方）层面的治理。“那边”的人现在必须采纳我们“这边”的解决方案。既然联邦政府不可能照顾到所有选民的步调……
There was a good (ish) book about this, called Breaking the two-party doom loop. * There's been an increased focus on federal (vs local) governing. People "over there" now need to adopt the solutions we have "over here". Since federal gov cannot possibly be in tune to all voters…
这个观点很棒。你可能会喜欢 Lee Drutman 的书《打破两党死局》（Breaking the Two Party Doom Loop），他的一个核心观点是：固定众议院的席位规模扭曲了国会的代表性，并加剧了极度党派化。他建议将代表人数增加到 700 人……
This is a good point. You might enjoy Lee Drutman's book, "Breaking the Two Party Doom Loop," where one of his key observations is that fixing the size of the House has distorted representation in Congress and contributed to hyper partisanship. He recommends increasing the size to 700 representatives…
到目前为止，我在 2022 年最喜欢的书有：政治类 ----------- 《为什么我们极化了》（Why We're Polarized） 《打破两党死局：美国多党民主的理据》（Breaking the Two Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America） 我喜欢把这两本书结合起来看，因为它们就像同一枚硬币的两面，而且提供了一种我觉得很多政治类书籍都不具备的东西：对一个更好……
So far my favorite books of 2022 are: Political ----------- Why We're Polarized Breaking the Two Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America I liked these two books together because they are two sides to the same coin and offers something I feel a lot of political books don't, a hope for a better…
是的。套用李·德鲁特曼（Lee Drutman）在《打破两党死局》里的说法：欧盟的极右翼政党往往能拿到大约 10% 的选票。某种程度上这挺糟的（他们能进议会拿到席位！）。但从另一角度看又是好事：他们没法自称代表“广大群众的心声”……
Yes. And to paraphrase Lee Drutman's take in Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: far-right parties in the EU tend to get about 10% of the vote. And in a way that's bad (they get seats in parliament!). But in another way, it's good: they can't claim to be "the voice of the masses"…
……在初选中投票的一小撮人偏见非常严重，而参加大选的选民又极其不想要另一个党的候选人时，现任议员就会占便宜。我建议读读李·德鲁特曼的《打破两党死局：美国多党民主的理据》。https://www.amazon.com/Breaking-Two-Party-Doom-Loop-Multipar...
…incumbent when the small group of people voting in a primary are very biased, and then the people voting in the general election really don't want the candidate from the other party. I suggest reading "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America" by Lee Drutman. https://www.amazon.com/Breaking-Two-Party-Doom-Loop-Multipar...
……很感兴趣但深表怀疑。一个真正的中间派政党确实会有帮助，但有很多结构性原因导致这不太可能发生，而这些问题必须先得到解决。关于这一点有本很棒的书叫《打破两党死局》（Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop）。我强烈推荐。
…interested but highly skeptical. A genuine center party would help, but there are many structural reasons why it’s not likely, and those would have to be addressed. There’s a great book about this titled “Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop.” I highly recommend it.
有一本讲这个的书写得还（算）不错，叫《打破两党死局》（Breaking the two-party doom loop）。* 现在大家越来越关注联邦（而非地方）层面的治理。“那边”的人现在必须采纳我们“这边”的解决方案。既然联邦政府不可能照顾到所有选民的步调……
There was a good (ish) book about this, called Breaking the two-party doom loop. * There's been an increased focus on federal (vs local) governing. People "over there" now need to adopt the solutions we have "over here". Since federal gov cannot possibly be in tune to all voters…