我很喜欢马克·伯吉斯（Mark Burgess）在《In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure》中给出的看法，他指出关注点分离（separation of concerns）是“由于规模导致分辨率下降的必然结果……一种保持理智的策略”。也许拥有……
I like the take Mark Burgess gives in In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure where he states that separation of concerns is "a necessary consequence of loss of resolution due to scale ... a strategy for staying sane." Perhaps having…
……足够的 if-case。但你需要两端都有确定性的输入和输出，以确保结果足够可预测，系统才不会崩溃搞砸。<此处插入一段关于“再去读读《In Search of Certainty》，马克·伯吉斯说得对”的冗长吐槽>
…enough if-case. But you need that deterministic input and outcome on each side to make sure that results are predictable enough that the system doesn't eat it. <Insert lenghty ranting about "Go read In Search of Certainty again, Mark Burgess is right" here>
……物理学。曾经被认为是不变的东西，通常只在特定尺度上表面上不变。当人们更细致地观察时，就会发现我们拥有的可能只是一种平均值的不变性。——马克·伯吉斯，《In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure》（2013）。这与开篇的引文非常契合：“以免人们怀疑你的故事不实，请时刻牢记概率的存在。”——约翰·盖伊（John Gay），英国诗人、剧作家……
…physics. What was once considered invariant, is usually only apparently invariant on a certain scale. When one looks in more detail, we find that we may only have invariance of an average. - Mark Burgess, In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure (2013) This accords well with the opening quotation Lest men suspect your tale untrue, Keep probability in view. - John Gay, English poet and dramatist…
……软件团队就会是一致的。（康威定律转述）关注点分离……由于规模导致分辨率下降的必然结果……一种保持理智的策略。（马克·伯吉斯，《In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure》，2013）[1] 取自我仿写的 fortune 工具 https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup
…the software team will be congruent. (paraphrasing of Conway's Law) Separation of concerns ... a necessary consequence of loss of resolution due to scale ... a strategy for staying sane. (Mark Burgess, In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure, 2013) [1] Taken from my fortune clone https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup
……拥有一种掌控感。——马克·伯吉斯 关注点分离……由于规模导致分辨率下降的必然结果……一种保持理智的策略。——马克·伯吉斯 这些引言都出自《In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure》（2013），摘自我的 fortune 数据库 https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup
…have a sense of control. - Mark Burgess Separation of concerns ... a necessary consequence of loss of resolution due to scale ... a strategy for staying sane. - Mark Burgess These quotes are all from In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure (2013), via my fortune database https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup
我懂你的意思。我提到的那本书（《Thinking in Promises》）是面向大众的入门读物。https://www.amazon.com/Promise-Theory-Principles-Application... 则是硬核的科学内容。《In Search of Certainty》（https://www.amazon.com/Search-Certainty-Science-Information-...）介于两者之间。我觉得承诺理论（promise theory）有其独特的一套逻辑和记号法。感谢 @dozzie 的指正。
I hear you. The book I mentioned (Thinking in Promises) is the introductory-level public book. https://www.amazon.com/Promise-Theory-Principles-Application... is the heavy-duty scientific stuff. "In Search of Certainty" (https://www.amazon.com/Search-Certainty-Science-Information-...) is somewhere in-between. I would say promise theory is its own kind of logic and notation. Thanks for the correction @dozzie.
我很喜欢马克·伯吉斯（Mark Burgess）在《In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure》中给出的看法，他指出关注点分离（separation of concerns）是“由于规模导致分辨率下降的必然结果……一种保持理智的策略”。也许拥有……
I like the take Mark Burgess gives in In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure where he states that separation of concerns is "a necessary consequence of loss of resolution due to scale ... a strategy for staying sane." Perhaps having…
……足够的 if-case。但你需要两端都有确定性的输入和输出，以确保结果足够可预测，系统才不会崩溃搞砸。<此处插入一段关于“再去读读《In Search of Certainty》，马克·伯吉斯说得对”的冗长吐槽>
…enough if-case. But you need that deterministic input and outcome on each side to make sure that results are predictable enough that the system doesn't eat it. <Insert lenghty ranting about "Go read In Search of Certainty again, Mark Burgess is right" here>
……物理学。曾经被认为是不变的东西，通常只在特定尺度上表面上不变。当人们更细致地观察时，就会发现我们拥有的可能只是一种平均值的不变性。——马克·伯吉斯，《In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure》（2013）。这与开篇的引文非常契合：“以免人们怀疑你的故事不实，请时刻牢记概率的存在。”——约翰·盖伊（John Gay），英国诗人、剧作家……
…physics. What was once considered invariant, is usually only apparently invariant on a certain scale. When one looks in more detail, we find that we may only have invariance of an average. - Mark Burgess, In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure (2013) This accords well with the opening quotation Lest men suspect your tale untrue, Keep probability in view. - John Gay, English poet and dramatist…
……软件团队就会是一致的。（康威定律转述）关注点分离……由于规模导致分辨率下降的必然结果……一种保持理智的策略。（马克·伯吉斯，《In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure》，2013）[1] 取自我仿写的 fortune 工具 https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup
…the software team will be congruent. (paraphrasing of Conway's Law) Separation of concerns ... a necessary consequence of loss of resolution due to scale ... a strategy for staying sane. (Mark Burgess, In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure, 2013) [1] Taken from my fortune clone https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup
……拥有一种掌控感。——马克·伯吉斯 关注点分离……由于规模导致分辨率下降的必然结果……一种保持理智的策略。——马克·伯吉斯 这些引言都出自《In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure》（2013），摘自我的 fortune 数据库 https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup
…have a sense of control. - Mark Burgess Separation of concerns ... a necessary consequence of loss of resolution due to scale ... a strategy for staying sane. - Mark Burgess These quotes are all from In Search of Certainty: The Science of Our Information Infrastructure (2013), via my fortune database https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup
我懂你的意思。我提到的那本书（《Thinking in Promises》）是面向大众的入门读物。https://www.amazon.com/Promise-Theory-Principles-Application... 则是硬核的科学内容。《In Search of Certainty》（https://www.amazon.com/Search-Certainty-Science-Information-...）介于两者之间。我觉得承诺理论（promise theory）有其独特的一套逻辑和记号法。感谢 @dozzie 的指正。
I hear you. The book I mentioned (Thinking in Promises) is the introductory-level public book. https://www.amazon.com/Promise-Theory-Principles-Application... is the heavy-duty scientific stuff. "In Search of Certainty" (https://www.amazon.com/Search-Certainty-Science-Information-...) is somewhere in-between. I would say promise theory is its own kind of logic and notation. Thanks for the correction @dozzie.