…textbook covering most of Econ 101. Some of these entries are only tangentially related to economic theory (Thinking Strategically, Capitalism vs. the Climate). There are also some glaring omissions (e.g. Radical Markets by Posner and Weyl).
If you are interested in a reasonable and effective proposal to this problem I recommend you read chapter 3 of Radical Markets by Posner and Weyl. They propose that every citizen be able to sponsor a migrant themselves.
I highly recommend the recently published book Radical Markets[1] which I read after listening to an interview with one of the authors on Econtalk[2]. From that summary: > Weyl urges a radical transformation of land and housing markets using a new federal real estate…
The seminal paper on this topic seems to be Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership[0] by Azar et al, and there's a whole chapter on this topic in Radical Markets[1], a recent book by Eric Posner and Glen Weyl. Both are worth reading if this is a topic you're interested in. [0] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2427345 [1] https://www.amazon.com/Radical-Markets-Uprooting-Capitalism-...
…when considering solutions, I guess I didn’t really do this in my comment. So thank you for this important insight! To offer some additional thoughts on this, I can recommend the thought provink book Radical Markets by Eric Posner and Glen Weyl. They present quadratic voting (next to some other ideas) as one means of arriving at better regulatory outcomes. To me it’s not a complete or perfect solution but certainly…
……覆盖大部分 Econ 101 的教科书。这里面的某些书目其实和经济学理论只有一点点沾边（比如《策略思维》、《资本主义对抗气候》）。另外还有一些显而易见的遗漏（比如波斯纳和韦尔合著的《激进市场》）。
…textbook covering most of Econ 101. Some of these entries are only tangentially related to economic theory (Thinking Strategically, Capitalism vs. the Climate). There are also some glaring omissions (e.g. Radical Markets by Posner and Weyl).
如果你对解决这个问题合理又有效的方案感兴趣，我建议你读读波斯纳和韦尔写的《激进市场》第三章。他们提议允许每个公民自己去担保一名移民。
If you are interested in a reasonable and effective proposal to this problem I recommend you read chapter 3 of Radical Markets by Posner and Weyl. They propose that every citizen be able to sponsor a migrant themselves.
关于支撑其存在的论证，我在格伦·韦尔和埃里克·波斯纳的书《激进市场》里找到了最全面的阐述。
The most-comprehensive argument that motivates its existence, I've found in Glen Weyl and Eric Posner's book "Radical Markets."
我强烈推荐最近出版的书《激进市场》[1]，我是听了 Econtalk[2] 上对其中一位作者的访谈后去读的。摘自那篇总结：> 韦尔呼吁利用一种新的联邦房地产……来彻底改造土地和住房市场。
I highly recommend the recently published book Radical Markets[1] which I read after listening to an interview with one of the authors on Econtalk[2]. From that summary: > Weyl urges a radical transformation of land and housing markets using a new federal real estate…
关于这个话题的开山之作似乎是阿扎尔等人写的《共同所有权的抗竞争效应》[0]，而在埃里克·波斯纳和格伦·韦尔最近出的书《激进市场》[1]里，整整有一章都在讲这个。如果你对这个话题感兴趣，两篇都值得一读。[0] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2427345 [1] https://www.amazon.com/Radical-Markets-Uprooting-Capitalism-...
The seminal paper on this topic seems to be Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership[0] by Azar et al, and there's a whole chapter on this topic in Radical Markets[1], a recent book by Eric Posner and Glen Weyl. Both are worth reading if this is a topic you're interested in. [0] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2427345 [1] https://www.amazon.com/Radical-Markets-Uprooting-Capitalism-...
……在考虑解决方案时，我想我在评论里确实没怎么做到这一点。所以非常感谢这个重要的见解！想再补充一点思考的话，我推荐埃里克·波斯纳和格伦·韦尔那本引人深思的书《激进市场》。他们把二次方投票（quadratic voting，以及其他一些想法）作为达成更好监管结果的一种手段提了出来。对我来说这算不上完整或完美的解决方案，但确实……
…when considering solutions, I guess I didn’t really do this in my comment. So thank you for this important insight! To offer some additional thoughts on this, I can recommend the thought provink book Radical Markets by Eric Posner and Glen Weyl. They present quadratic voting (next to some other ideas) as one means of arriving at better regulatory outcomes. To me it’s not a complete or perfect solution but certainly…