伽利略的错误
Galileo's Error
Philip Goff · 初版 2019 年
3人推荐
7位读者提及
7次提及
“立足于对现代科学哲学基础的剖析，并基于 Arthur Eddington 和 Bertrand Russell 二十世纪早期的著作，Goff 论证了泛心论——这一理论认为意识不仅局限于生物体，而是所有物理物质的基本特征，从亚原子粒子到人脑皆是如此。在 Galileo's Error 中，他为通往人类意识终极理论的新路径迈出了第一步。”——护封折页。
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……觉得泛心论（panpsychism）只需要好好解释清楚，大多数人大概就会赞同这个观点，或者至少能欣然接受。我起初也觉得有点天方夜谭，但读了 Phillip Goff 的《Galileo's Error》之后，感觉还挺站得住脚的。泛心论本身也涵盖了非常多的理论。以我个人的经验来说，使用致幻剂反而几乎让我更加坚定了唯物主义。那种认为现实、你的自我……
…think panpsychism just needs to be explained well and probably most people would be onboard with the idea or at least comfortable accepting it. I thought it was a little wild at first but after reading "Galileo's Error" by Phillip Goff it seems ok. Panspychism it self covers so many theories too. In my personal experience psychedelic use seemed to almost solidify materialism for me. The idea that reality, your self…
这推理不错，但你的前提条件是从哪儿得来的？读完 Annaka Harris 的《Conscious》和 Philip Goff 的《Galileo’s Error》之后，在我看来（也是逻辑上最简洁的解法），泛心论确实解释了宇宙。也就是说，徒劳地去寻找在哪些动物或系统之间划出“界限”……
This is good reasoning, but from where did you get the requirements? After having read Annaka Harris’ “Conscious” and Philip Goff’s “Galileo’s Error”, it seems plausible to me (and the most logically simple resolution) that panpsychism explains the universe. I.e., in the vain search for the place to draw “the line” between what animals or systems…
……一些开始介绍这些观点的书。关于意识这个主题，没那么学术、更偏向大众的书有：David Chalmers 的《Reality+》、Thomas Nagel 的《Mind and Cosmos》，以及 Phillip Goff 的《Galileo's Error》，它们能给你展现一整套有趣的观点谱系。哲学争论的特点在于，它们源自一张非常古老复杂的思想之网，如今已被淬炼成极其鲜明的立场……
…some books that begin to introduce these ideas. On the topic of consciousness, less academic and more slated towards general audience: Reality+ by David Chalmers and Mind and Cosmos by Thomas Nagel and Galileo's Error by Phillip Goff will give you and interesting gamut of ideas. The thing about arguments in philosophy is that they span from a very old web of thought that has been refined into very sharp positions…
我最近一直在读 Philip Goff 的《Galileo's Error》，里面涉及了很多这方面的内容（他是泛心论的支持者）。是一本探讨各种论点的相当有趣的书，不过我觉得（我之前完全没有这类背景……
I've recently been reading Galileo's Error by Philip Goff which covers a lot of this ground (he's a proponent of panpsychism). Quite an interesting look into the various arguments though I thought (I previously had no background in this type of…
《Galileo's Error》是哲学家 Philip Goff 阐述他那一版泛心论的书——能吸引大约 20 位学者在期刊特刊上针对你的观点各抒己见/挑刺开炮，已经相当厉害了！——……
Galileo's Error is philosopher Philip Goff's book stating his version of panpsychism - pretty impressive to have 20 or so academics interested enough in your idea to take potshots at it in a special journal issue! -…
Goff 为他的书起名《Galileo's Error》的意图在引言里就有解释：伽利略把科学局限在可量化的事物上，完全忽视了质的因素。注意这个词和“qualia”（感受质）有共同的词源。某种程度上……
The purpose of Goff's choice for the title of his book Galileo's Error is explained in the introduction: that Galileo limited science to only things that are quantifiable, and completely ignores qualitative factors. Note the common etymology with the word qualia. Some way…