面向对象本体论：一种新的万物理论
Object-Oriented Ontology:A New Theory of Everything
Graham Harman · 初版 2018 年
2人推荐
5位读者提及
6次提及
我们人类往往倾向于认为，事物唯有在被我们感知时才是真实的，这一观念受到了现代哲学的强化，后者将人类赋予特权地位，视其在本质上与所有其他客体截然不同。但正如该理论的核心阐释者之一 Graham Harman 所指出的，Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO) 摒弃了人类特殊性的观念：他明确指出，世界绝非仅是向人类所呈现的世界。“去思考一种超越我们思维的实在不仅并非无稽之谈，而且是必由之路。”OOO 的核心思想在于，客体——无论是真实的、虚构的、自然的、人造的、人类还是非人类——都
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
你或许应该看看齐泽克和 Graham Harman（搞面向对象本体论的那位）的辩论：https://youtu.be/6GHiV4tuRt8 虽然 ooo 不等同于 oo，但你大概能体会到哲学家们在本体论中更关注属性问题（共相、唯名论等）的地方……
You should probably check out the debate between Zizek and Graham Harman (the object oriented ontology guy): https://youtu.be/6GHiV4tuRt8 Although ooo is not directly oo, you can probably pick up on where philosophers are more concerned with the problem of properties ( universals, nominalism, etc) in ontology…
太妙了！这种想法我在外界没怎么见过，但有一本叫《Object Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything》的书，倒是从一个扎根于科学的绝妙哲学视角切入了这一点。它基本上是说，任何哲学框架对待虚构存在，都必须像对待物理存在一样有充分的解释力，……
Neat! I haven't seen this idea out in the world much, but a book called "Object Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything" kinda runs at this from a neat science-rooted philosophy perspective. It basically says that any philosophical framework needs to have just as much to say about fictional beings as it does physical,…
……我的人生。”[1] 我也想到了哥白尼，以及在他之前人们其实就已经用切实可行的方式在对行星运动建模了，尽管可能多了几个变量。最后，我想到了 Graham Harman 的《Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything》。虽然我并不完全赞同它，但它提出了一个观点：一个真正具有解释力的宇宙理论，必须将虚构、隐喻和语言都视作“真实”来包容进去。所以如果这是真的，那么……
…my life."[1] I'm also thinking about Copernicus and how people were actually modelling planetary motion in workable ways before him, though perhaps with a few more variables. Lastly, I'm thinking of "Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything", by Graham Harman. I don't subscribe to it fully, but it raises a case for how a truly explanatory theory of our universe MUST encompass fiction and metaphor and language as "real". So if true, then…
在《Weird Realism》中，Graham Harman 还有个看法，那就是把洛夫克拉夫特奉为他那套面向对象本体论的守护圣徒。
There's also Graham Harman's take on Lovecraft as the patron saint of his object-oriented ontology, in Weird Realism.
……关于那篇面向对象本体论（OOO）文章的澄清。我粗略扫了一眼，但感觉它一直没触及什么具体的东西（也可能是我看漏了）；然后我去亚马逊查了他推荐的那本书（《Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything》），看了一些评论，但也大多是一味赞美，根本没提多少具体的内容细节。
…clarifications on the Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO) article. I skimmed it, but it didn't seem like it ever got to something concrete (I could be wrong); then I looked up his book recommendation on Amazon ("Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything") and read some reviews, but they were also mostly just praise without saying anything very specific about the content.
我不知道这算不算对现象学的新解构。虽然提到了德里达，但如果你对面向对象本体论感兴趣，可能会想了解海德格尔。海德格尔往往因其政治立场让人避而远之。Morton 正在努力让下一代思想家能够理解关于崩溃的凄凉预言。你得去读点提到超客体（hyperobjects）的东西……
I don’t know if this is a new take on phenomenology. Derrida is mentioned, but you might be interested in Heidegger if curious about Object-Oriented Ontology. Heidegger is often avoided for his politics. Morton is trying to make bleak predictions of collapse comprehensible for the next generation of thinkers. You’ll have to read something that mentions hyperobjects…