>They work just well enough so you're not paying attention and then the car hands you control without warning. There's a book, Our Robots, Ourselves by David Mindell, which describes the aviation experience with auto-land. Auto-land is no longer used for this reason, and the related one that the automatic system gives up when the situation is bad…
之前没意识到这个想法的渊源可以追溯到1983年。我是在《我们的机器人，我们自己》这本书里读到的。书中谈到了民航飞行员对90年代末/2000年代初引入的自动着陆系统的体验。读过《自动化的讽刺》（Ironies of Automation）后你就能料到，在经历了几次险情和并非……
Didn't realise the pedigree of the idea went back to 1983. I read about this in a book "Our Robots, Ourselves". That talked about airline pilots' experience with auto-land systems introduced in the late 1990s/ early 2000s. As you'd expect after having read Ironies of Automation, after a few near misses and not…
…which it needs to hand over control to a human. How will that work in a vehicle that is not designed to be occupied by someone that knows how to control it? This problem has been written about in the book Our Robots, Ourselves [0] and there is an Econ Talk podcast about it as well [1]. To me, it makes sense to make use of the brain power provided by the occupant of the vehicle. For example, if one of the main vision sensors…
他的立场似乎与 MIT 工程师戴维·明德尔相似，后者最近写了《我们的机器人，我们自己》[1]。在我看来，一个人花在用 AI 解决实际问题上的时间越多，就越不可能相信末日即将来临。相反，一个预言家越是依赖于……
His position seems to be similar to MIT engineer David Mindell's, who recently wrote Our Robots, Ourselves[1]. It seems to me that the more hours one spends solving real problems with AI, the less likely they are to believe an apocalypse is imminent. Conversely, the more dependent a prognosticator is on…
…head-up displays of key information to the pilots.[2] Honest advocates of self driving would admit that they want it for its convenience. 1. Whether or not that human is in the vehicle. 2. source: Our Robots, Ourselves, David Mindell. Mindell was (is?) a practising engineer involved with underwater autonomous vehicle design and operation.
>它们刚好能让你放松警惕，然后车辆在毫无预警的情况下突然把控制权甩给你。有一本书叫戴维·明德尔（David Mindell）写的《我们的机器人，我们自己》（Our Robots, Ourselves），里面描述了航空领域使用自动着陆（auto-land）的经验。自动着陆现在不再使用正是因为这个原因，以及相关的另一个问题：一旦情况变糟，自动系统就会直接罢工……
>They work just well enough so you're not paying attention and then the car hands you control without warning. There's a book, Our Robots, Ourselves by David Mindell, which describes the aviation experience with auto-land. Auto-land is no longer used for this reason, and the related one that the automatic system gives up when the situation is bad…
之前没意识到这个想法的渊源可以追溯到1983年。我是在《我们的机器人，我们自己》这本书里读到的。书中谈到了民航飞行员对90年代末/2000年代初引入的自动着陆系统的体验。读过《自动化的讽刺》（Ironies of Automation）后你就能料到，在经历了几次险情和并非……
Didn't realise the pedigree of the idea went back to 1983. I read about this in a book "Our Robots, Ourselves". That talked about airline pilots' experience with auto-land systems introduced in the late 1990s/ early 2000s. As you'd expect after having read Ironies of Automation, after a few near misses and not…
……在何时需要将控制权移交给人类。如果一辆车在设计上就根本不是让懂驾驶的人坐在里面，那这套机制该怎么运作？《我们的机器人，我们自己》[0] 这本书讨论过这个问题，Econ Talk 播客里也有一期聊过[1]。在我看来，利用车内乘客的脑力是合情合理的。例如，如果主视觉传感器之一……
…which it needs to hand over control to a human. How will that work in a vehicle that is not designed to be occupied by someone that knows how to control it? This problem has been written about in the book Our Robots, Ourselves [0] and there is an Econ Talk podcast about it as well [1]. To me, it makes sense to make use of the brain power provided by the occupant of the vehicle. For example, if one of the main vision sensors…
他的立场似乎与 MIT 工程师戴维·明德尔相似，后者最近写了《我们的机器人，我们自己》[1]。在我看来，一个人花在用 AI 解决实际问题上的时间越多，就越不可能相信末日即将来临。相反，一个预言家越是依赖于……
His position seems to be similar to MIT engineer David Mindell's, who recently wrote Our Robots, Ourselves[1]. It seems to me that the more hours one spends solving real problems with AI, the less likely they are to believe an apocalypse is imminent. Conversely, the more dependent a prognosticator is on…
……向飞行员平视显示关键信息。[2] 自动驾驶的真心支持者会承认他们想要这套系统图的就是方便。1. 不论那个人是否在车内。2. 来源：《我们的机器人，我们自己》，戴维·明德尔。明德尔曾是（现在还是？）一名参与水下自主航行器设计与操作的执业工程师。
…head-up displays of key information to the pilots.[2] Honest advocates of self driving would admit that they want it for its convenience. 1. Whether or not that human is in the vehicle. 2. source: Our Robots, Ourselves, David Mindell. Mindell was (is?) a practising engineer involved with underwater autonomous vehicle design and operation.