汤姆·邦巴迪尔历险记
The Adventures of Tom Bombadil
J.R.R. Tolkien · 初版 1984 年
1人推荐
3位读者提及
4次提及
“《Les Aventures de Tom Bombadil》是 J. R. R. Tolkien 于 1962 年出版的诗集。全书收录了十六首诗歌，其中仅前两首与 Tom Bombadil 这一角色真正相关。整部作品集风格多样，既有轻松幽默的篇章（《Le Troll de pierre》《Fastitocalon》）与对音韵的巧妙运用（《Errance》《Chat》），亦伴有更为低沉、忧郁的诗句（《La Cloche marine》《Le Dernier Vaisseau》）。”--
Hacker News 上怎么说
正在加载完整评论……
……把戒指给汤姆的问题在于，他很可能会把戒指弄丢，因为他根本不觉得这玩意儿有多重要。汤姆只在乎吃喝玩乐、享受当下。从这一点来看，他是一个酒神狄奥尼索斯式的人物。如果你读过《汤姆·庞巴迪历险记》（令人惊讶的是本文作者居然没引用），就会发现他显然是以狄奥尼索斯神话体系为原型的。
…the ring to Tom is that he would probably lose the ring, not thinking it very important. Tom only cares of eating and drinking and making merry. In that regard he is a Dionysian figure. If you read the Adventures of Tom Bombadil (which this author surprisingly doesn't reference) he is clearly modeled on the Dionysus cycle of myths.
……在全书完结后依然是个谜。他超脱于剧情之外，完全不受魔戒的影响，而其他所有角色——包括神明——无一例外都会受其影响。结合他在《汤姆·庞巴迪历险记》中展现的特质，以及托尔金的信件（信中明确否认了庞巴迪是“伊露维塔”，即托尔金笔下的造物主），我多年前就得出了结论：汤姆·庞巴迪其实就是 J.R.R. 托尔金本人……
…enigmatic after the book concludes. He transcends the plot and is unaffected by the ring, unlike literally every other character, including gods. In cross-reference to his characteristics depicted in The Adventures of Tom Bombadil, and to the letters of Tolkien (which contain a specific denial of Bombadil being "Iluvatar", that is, Tolkien's fictional creator) I came to the conclusion years ago that Tom Bombadil is J.R.R. Tolkien…
我总觉得汤姆·庞巴迪纯粹是个垫场角色，用来串联起雄鹿地和跃马客栈之间的剧情。托尔金之前就已经单独写了包含金莓和柳树老人的《汤姆·庞巴迪历险记》。他只是顺手把它塞进《护戒同盟》里用来填补篇幅。我以前看书都是直接跳过汤姆那一章，直奔布理。现在我会读一读……
I always felt that Tom Bombadil was filler in order to bridge events between Crick Hollow and the Prancing Pony. Tolkien had already written The Adventures of Tom Bombadil as a separate piece with Goldberry and Old Man Willow. He just dropped that into the Fellowship and used it to fill the space. I used to skip the Tom section and move right up to Bree. Now I read the…
……熟悉人类所有形式的神话。盲目认定《魔戒》里的所有角色都必须在《圣经》里找到对应，是一种很偷懒的做法。汤姆·庞巴迪在《汤姆·庞巴迪历险记》里“掳走”（按该词古义[1]）金莓的情节，与其他神话体系契合得很好，但跟“最初的人类”或“亚当”的设定完全不搭（甚至都不清楚庞巴迪是不是伊露直接创造的）。我觉得如果你真去读一下……
…familiar with all forms of human myth. To blindly assume that all characters in LotR must have a Biblical corollary is lazy. Tom Bombadil "rapes" Goldberry (in the ancient sense of the word[1]) in The Adventures of Tom Bombadil that comports nicely with other myth cycles and not very well with the idea of the "first Man" or "Adam" (it's not even clear that Bombadil is Eru's direct creation). I think if you actually read the…